https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Duo_et_al_2023aDuo et al 2023a - Revision history2026-04-16T17:05:45ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Duo_et_al_2023a&diff=284837&oldid=prevJSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 666740123 to Duo et al 2023a2023-10-03T11:25:19Z<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_666740123" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 666740123">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 666740123</a> to <a href="/public/Duo_et_al_2023a" title="Duo et al 2023a">Duo et al 2023a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:25, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Duo_et_al_2023a&diff=284702&oldid=prevJSanchez at 10:28, 3 October 20232023-10-03T10:28:12Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:28, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The concrete industry is facing an increasing challenge for sustainability. Besides the large embodied carbon, the intensive operational carbon associated with repetitive repair becomes the main hurdle for lifecycle emission reduction. In this study, the feasibility of sequestering CO2 into durable engineered cementitious composite (ECC) through early-age carbonation curing was investigated. The goal is to demonstrate a simultaneous reduction of the material’s embodied carbon (by CO2 sequestration) and lifecycle emissions (by ECC’s superior durability). The material was processed at both lab and pilot scales and was demonstrated on precast pedestrian pavement slabs. Results show that ECC was highly reactive to CO2 at lab scale, with 26.5% CO2 uptake by cement mass after 24-hour carbonation. However, the early-age carbonation was subjected to a significant size effect and attained a 4.3% CO2 uptake for pilot-scale specimens with a low specific surface area. Despite this reduction in carbonation efficiency, the calcite precipitation through carbonation curing was found to densify the fiber/matrix interface and improve the composite ultimate tensile and flexural strength by up to 28.8%. Carbonation curing also enhanced ECC’s crack width control, thus mitigating sulfate attack and lowering surface salt scaling on freeze-thaw exposure. It is suggested that producing ECC through carbonation curing is technically viable, and the carbon-sequestered ECC is recommended for small-scale precast components for enhanced durability and sustainability.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The concrete industry is facing an increasing challenge for sustainability. Besides the large embodied carbon, the intensive operational carbon associated with repetitive repair becomes the main hurdle for lifecycle emission reduction. In this study, the feasibility of sequestering CO2 into durable engineered cementitious composite (ECC) through early-age carbonation curing was investigated. The goal is to demonstrate a simultaneous reduction of the material’s embodied carbon (by CO2 sequestration) and lifecycle emissions (by ECC’s superior durability). The material was processed at both lab and pilot scales and was demonstrated on precast pedestrian pavement slabs. Results show that ECC was highly reactive to CO2 at lab scale, with 26.5% CO2 uptake by cement mass after 24-hour carbonation. However, the early-age carbonation was subjected to a significant size effect and attained a 4.3% CO2 uptake for pilot-scale specimens with a low specific surface area. Despite this reduction in carbonation efficiency, the calcite precipitation through carbonation curing was found to densify the fiber/matrix interface and improve the composite ultimate tensile and flexural strength by up to 28.8%. Carbonation curing also enhanced ECC’s crack width control, thus mitigating sulfate attack and lowering surface salt scaling on freeze-thaw exposure. It is suggested that producing ECC through carbonation curing is technically viable, and the carbon-sequestered ECC is recommended for small-scale precast components for enhanced durability and sustainability.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_666740123109.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Duo_et_al_2023a&diff=284700&oldid=prevJSanchez at 10:28, 3 October 20232023-10-03T10:28:10Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:28, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The concrete industry is facing an increasing challenge for sustainability. Besides the large embodied carbon, the intensive operational carbon associated with repetitive repair becomes the main hurdle for lifecycle emission reduction. In this study, the feasibility of sequestering CO2 into durable engineered cementitious composite (ECC) through early-age carbonation curing was investigated. The goal is to demonstrate a simultaneous reduction of the material’s embodied carbon (by CO2 sequestration) and lifecycle emissions (by ECC’s superior durability). The material was processed at both lab and pilot scales and was demonstrated on precast pedestrian pavement slabs. Results show that ECC was highly reactive to CO2 at lab scale, with 26.5% CO2 uptake by cement mass after 24-hour carbonation. However, the early-age carbonation was subjected to a significant size effect and attained a 4.3% CO2 uptake for pilot-scale specimens with a low specific surface area. Despite this reduction in carbonation efficiency, the calcite precipitation through carbonation curing was found to densify the fiber/matrix interface and improve the composite ultimate tensile and flexural strength by up to 28.8%. Carbonation curing also enhanced ECC’s crack width control, thus mitigating sulfate attack and lowering surface salt scaling on freeze-thaw exposure. It is suggested that producing ECC through carbonation curing is technically viable, and the carbon-sequestered ECC is recommended for small-scale precast components for enhanced durability and sustainability.</ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284699:newid:284700 -->
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Duo_et_al_2023a&diff=284699&oldid=prevJSanchez: Created blank page2023-10-03T10:28:08Z<p>Created blank page</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>JSanchez