Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 131285828 to Doty et al 2017a

2021-02-02T01:29:23Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 131285828 to Doty et al 2017a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Contrary to traditional thinking and driver intuition, here we show that there is no benefit to ground vehicles increasing their packing density at stoppages...."

2021-02-02T01:29:19Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Contrary to traditional thinking and driver intuition, here we show that there is no benefit to ground vehicles increasing their packing density at stoppages...."

New page

== Abstract ==

Contrary to traditional thinking and driver intuition, here we show that there is no benefit to ground vehicles increasing their packing density at stoppages. By systematically controlling the packing density of vehicles queued at a traffic light on a Smart Road, drone footage revealed that the benefit of an initial increase in displacement for close-packed vehicles is completely offset by the lag time inherent to changing back into a ‘liquid phase’ when flowresumes. This lag is analogous to the thermodynamic concept of the latent heat of fusion, as the ‘temperature’ (kinetic energy) of the vehicles cannot increase until the traffic ‘melts’ into the liquid phase.These findings suggest that in situations where gridlock is not an issue, drivers should not decrease their spacing during stoppages in order to lessen the likelihood of collisions with no loss in flowefficiency. In contrast, motion capture experiments of a line of people walking from rest showed higher flow efficiency with increased packing densities, indicating that the importance of latent heat becomes trivial for slower moving systems. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics at Virginia Tech Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology

Document type: Article

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_131285828-beopen3633-3757-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0] under the license http://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining

* [http://hdl.handle.net/10919/84307 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/84307],
: [https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0] under the license cc-by

* [http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/19/i=11/a=113034/pdf http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/19/i=11/a=113034/pdf],
: [http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/19/i=11/a=113034?key=crossref.d6fdd4a0603b9a8d3d0fc353c7e27987 http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/19/i=11/a=113034?key=crossref.d6fdd4a0603b9a8d3d0fc353c7e27987],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

* [https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0/pdf],
: [https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0/meta https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa95f0/meta],
: [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NJPh...19k3034F/abstract https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NJPh...19k3034F/abstract],
: [https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/84307 https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/84307],
: [https://trid.trb.org/view/1492284 https://trid.trb.org/view/1492284],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2770718500 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2770718500] under the license http://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining

* [ ]

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:29, 2 February 2021
(No difference)

Doty et al 2017a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 131285828 to Doty et al 2017a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Contrary to traditional thinking and driver intuition, here we show that there is no benefit to ground vehicles increasing their packing density at stoppages...."