Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 362833852 to Dooley et al 2008a

2020-10-26T09:19:41Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 362833852 to Dooley et al 2008a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == AbstractInterest is growing regarding the potential size of a future U.S.-dedicated carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline infrastructure if carbon dioxide capture and..."

2020-10-26T09:19:39Z

Created page with " == Abstract == AbstractInterest is growing regarding the potential size of a future U.S.-dedicated carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline infrastructure if carbon dioxide capture and..."

New page

== Abstract ==

AbstractInterest is growing regarding the potential size of a future U.S.-dedicated carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline infrastructure if carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) technologies are commercially deployed on a large scale within the United States. This paper assesses the potential scale of the CO2 pipeline system needed under two hypothetical climate policies (WRE450 and WRE550 stabilization scenarios); a comparison is then made to the extant U.S. pipeline infrastructures used to deliver CO2 for enhanced oil recovery and to move natural gas and liquid hydrocarbons from areas of production and importation to markets. The analysis reveals that between 11,000 and 23,000 additional miles of dedicated CO2 pipeline might be needed in the United States before 2050 across these two cases. While either case represents a significant increase over the 3900 miles that comprise the existing national CO2 pipeline infrastructure, it is important to realize that the demand for additional CO2 pipeline capacity will unfold relatively slowly and in a geographically dispersed manner as new dedicated CCS-enabled power plants and industrial facilities are brought online. During the period 2010Â2030, this analysis indicates growth in the CO2 pipeline system on the order of a few hundred to less than 1000 miles per year. By comparison, during the period 1950Â2000, the U.S. natural gas pipeline distribution system grew at rates that far exceed these growth projections for a future CO2 pipeline network in the U.S. This analysis indicates that the need to increase the size of the existing dedicated CO2 pipeline system should not be seen as a major obstacle for the commercial deployment of CCS technologies in the United States. While there could be issues associated with siting specific segments of a larger national CO2 pipeline infrastructure, the sheer scale of the required infrastructure should not be seen as representing a significant impediment to U.S. deployment of CCS technologies.

Document type: Report

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_362833852-beopen161-6670-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1039495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1039495]

* [http://sallan.org/pdf-docs/Sequester-OK.pdf http://sallan.org/pdf-docs/Sequester-OK.pdf]

* [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209] under the license cc-by-nc-nd

* [https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1876610209002100?httpAccept=text/xml https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1876610209002100?httpAccept=text/xml],[https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1876610209002100?httpAccept=text/plain https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1876610209002100?httpAccept=text/plain],[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209] under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

* [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610209002100 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610209002100],[http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/data/gtsp/publications/2008/2008_Dooley_pipeline_networks.pdf http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/data/gtsp/publications/2008/2008_Dooley_pipeline_networks.pdf],[https://core.ac.uk/display/82477482 https://core.ac.uk/display/82477482],[https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc841161 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc841161],[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610209002100 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610209002100],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2093308171 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2093308171]

DOIS: 10.2172/1039495 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.209

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:19, 26 October 2020
(No difference)

Dooley et al 2008a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 362833852 to Dooley et al 2008a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == AbstractInterest is growing regarding the potential size of a future U.S.-dedicated carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline infrastructure if carbon dioxide capture and..."