<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Dhakal%2A_Cubrinovski_2024a</id>
		<title>Dhakal* Cubrinovski 2024a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Dhakal%2A_Cubrinovski_2024a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-07T06:28:47Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301979&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 856798126 to Dhakal* Cubrinovski 2024a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301979&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2024-06-07T11:53:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JSanchez moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_856798126&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Sanchez Pinedo 856798126&quot;&gt;Draft Sanchez Pinedo 856798126&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&quot; title=&quot;Dhakal* Cubrinovski 2024a&quot;&gt;Dhakal* Cubrinovski 2024a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:53, 7 June 2024&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JSanchez</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301978&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JSanchez at 11:53, 7 June 2024</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301978&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2024-06-07T11:53:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:53, 7 June 2024&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l3&quot; &gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Major challenges are encountered in characterizing and performing liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils since performing traditional in-situ tests, such as the Cone Penetration Test (CPT), in gravelly soils can be challenging, and since gravelly soils are not well-represented in existing case history databases used to develop semi-empirical methods for liquefaction assessment. This has been the primary reason for the ongoing efforts to develop methods based on other invasive tests, such as shear-wave velocity (Vs), and penetration tests with larger probes and greater energy delivered to the rod, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DPT). While CPT-based liquefaction analyses have been comprehensively studied, limited research has been conducted comparatively evaluating the performance of the other two methods. This paper performs liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly reclamations using data from the welldocumented case history of the port of Wellington (New Zealand) using CPT, DPT, and Vs measurements. Results show that while the Vs measurements overestimate liquefaction resistance, the DPT and CPT agreed relatively well with observations from past earthquakes due to the greater sensitivity of these test methods to soil density and stratigraphy&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Major challenges are encountered in characterizing and performing liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils since performing traditional in-situ tests, such as the Cone Penetration Test (CPT), in gravelly soils can be challenging, and since gravelly soils are not well-represented in existing case history databases used to develop semi-empirical methods for liquefaction assessment. This has been the primary reason for the ongoing efforts to develop methods based on other invasive tests, such as shear-wave velocity (Vs), and penetration tests with larger probes and greater energy delivered to the rod, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DPT). While CPT-based liquefaction analyses have been comprehensively studied, limited research has been conducted comparatively evaluating the performance of the other two methods. This paper performs liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly reclamations using data from the welldocumented case history of the port of Wellington (New Zealand) using CPT, DPT, and Vs measurements. Results show that while the Vs measurements overestimate liquefaction resistance, the DPT and CPT agreed relatively well with observations from past earthquakes due to the greater sensitivity of these test methods to soil density and stratigraphy&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;== Full Paper ==&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_85679812686.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301976:newid:301978 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JSanchez</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301976&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JSanchez at 11:53, 7 June 2024</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301976&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2024-06-07T11:53:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:53, 7 June 2024&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;==Abstract==&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Major challenges are encountered in characterizing and performing liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils since performing traditional in-situ tests, such as the Cone Penetration Test (CPT), in gravelly soils can be challenging, and since gravelly soils are not well-represented in existing case history databases used to develop semi-empirical methods for liquefaction assessment. This has been the primary reason for the ongoing efforts to develop methods based on other invasive tests, such as shear-wave velocity (Vs), and penetration tests with larger probes and greater energy delivered to the rod, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DPT). While CPT-based liquefaction analyses have been comprehensively studied, limited research has been conducted comparatively evaluating the performance of the other two methods. This paper performs liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly reclamations using data from the welldocumented case history of the port of Wellington (New Zealand) using CPT, DPT, and Vs measurements. Results show that while the Vs measurements overestimate liquefaction resistance, the DPT and CPT agreed relatively well with observations from past earthquakes due to the greater sensitivity of these test methods to soil density and stratigraphy&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301975:newid:301976 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JSanchez</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301975&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JSanchez: Created blank page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Dhakal*_Cubrinovski_2024a&amp;diff=301975&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2024-06-07T11:53:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created blank page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JSanchez</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>