Scipediacontent at 15:01, 17 April 2019

2019-04-17T15:01:28Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 862263963 to Cano-Oron 2019b

2019-04-08T14:01:35Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 862263963 to Cano-Oron 2019b

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeop..."

2019-04-08T14:01:32Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeop..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeopathy, collected in four waves in five countries: Spain, France, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Specifically, the fluctuation of the corpus ranking is studied, and a sample of the ten best-positioned pages in each country is taken to analyze their content (the authorship of the website, the stance of the effectiveness of homeopathy, the presence of controversy and the type of content). The results show that the ranking is stable; that the stance of homeopathy is linked to the state of public opinion in the country; the majority of better-positioned websites being of news published in the media.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 17 April 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

−	Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeopathy, collected in four waves in five countries: Spain, France, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Specifically, the fluctuation of the corpus ranking is studied, and a sample of the ten best-positioned pages in each country is taken to analyze their content (the authorship of the website, the stance of the effectiveness of homeopathy, the presence of controversy and the type of content). The results show that the ranking is stable; that the stance of homeopathy is linked to the state of public opinion in the country; the majority of better-positioned ~~websites being~~ of news ~~published~~ in the media.	+	Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeopathy, collected in four waves in five countries: Spain, France, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Specifically, the fluctuation of the corpus ranking is studied, and a sample of the ten best-positioned pages in each country is taken to analyze their content (the authorship of the website, the stance of the effectiveness of homeopathy, the presence of controversy and the type of content). The results show that the ranking is stable; that the stance of homeopathy is linked to the state of public opinion in the country; and that the majority of websites that appear better-positioned are from media.
		+
		+	== Full document ==
		+	<pdf>Media:Cano-Oron_2019b-71717-1515-document.pdf</pdf>
		+
		+
		+	== References ==
		+
		+	Allam, Ahmed; Schulz, Peter-Johannes; Nakamoto, Kent (2014). “The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: Two experiments manipulating Google output”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 16, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2642
		+
		+	Ananny, Mike (2016). “Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness”. Science, technology & human values, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915606523
		+
		+	Arif, Nadia; Al-Jefri, Majed; Bizzi, Isabella H.; Boitano-Perano, Gianni; Goldman, Michel; Haq, Inam; Chua, Kee-Leng; Mengozzi, Manuela; Neunez, Marie; Smith, Helen; Ghezzi, Pietro (2018). “Fake news or weak science? Visibility and characterization of antivaccine webpages returned by Google in different languages and countries”. Frontiers in immunology, v. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01215
		+
		+	Baker, Paul; Potts, Amanda (2013). “‘Why do white people have thin lips?’ Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms”. Critical discourse studies, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320
		+
		+	Ballatore, Andrea (2015). “Google chemtrails: A methodology to analyze topic representation in search engine results”. First Monday, v. 20, n. 7. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i7.5597
		+
		+	Bozdag, Engin (2013). “Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization”. Ethics and information technology, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
		+
		+	Cano-Orón, Lorena (2016). “Correlación entre las búsquedas sobre terapias complementarias en Google y su uso por parte de la población española”. Panace@, v. 17, n. 44, pp. 124-132. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5794532
		+
		+	Cano-Orón, Lorena; Mendoza-Poudereux, Isabel; Moreno-Castro, Carolina (2018a). “Perfil sociodemográfico del usuario de la homeopatía en España”. Atención primaria. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2018.07.006
		+
		+	Cano-Orón, Lorena; Mendoza-Poudereux, Isabel; Moreno-Castro, Carolina (2019). “The rise of skepticism in the Spanish political and digital media contexts”. JCOM. En prensa.
		+
		+	Del-Gigante, Michael (2018). “The state of healthcare advertising: 4 key digital spend trends”. Mdgadvertising, July 24th. https://www.mdgadvertising.com/marketing-insights/the-state-of-healthcare-advertising-4-key-digital-spend-trends
		+
		+	Díaz, Alejandro (2008). “Through the Google Goggles: Sociopolitical bias in search engine design”. In: Spink, Amanda; Zimmer, Michael (eds). Web search. Multidisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: Springer, pp. 11-34. ISBN: 978 3 540 75828 0 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_2
		+
		+	Gerhart, Susan (2004). “Do web search engines suppress controversy?”. First Monday, v. 9, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v9i1.1111
		+
		+	Germano, Fabrizio; Sobbrio, Francesco (2017). “Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)”. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2890853
		+
		+	Gillespie, Tarleton (2014). “The relevance of algorithms”. In: Gillespie, Tarleton; Boczkowski, Pablo; Foot, Kirsten (eds.). Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 167-194. ISBN: 978 0 262 52537 4 https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Gillespie_2014_The-Relevance-of-Algorithms.pdf
		+
		+	Gillespie, Tarleton (2017). “Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem”. Information, communication & society, v. 20, n.1, pp. 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1199721
		+
		+	Gonzalo-Penela, Carlos (2015). Posicionamiento web y dinámicas de información en motores de búsqueda: propuestas de análisis y estudio comparativo de visibilidad de contenidos digitales en el caso de procesos electorales. Tesis doctoral. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23621
		+
		+	Gonzalo-Penela, Carlos; Codina, Lluís; Rovira, Cristòfol (2015). “Recuperación de información centrada en el usuario y SEO: categorización y determinación de las intenciones de búsqueda en la Web”. Index.comunicación: revista científica de comunicación aplicada, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 19-27. http://journals.sfu.ca/indexcomunicacion/index.php/indexcomunicacion/article/view/197
		+
		+	Haim, Mario; Arendt, Florian; Scherr, Sebastian (2017). “Abyss or shelter? On the relevance of web search engines’ search results when people google for suicide”. Health communication, v. 32, n. 2, pp. 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1113484
		+
		+	Haim, Mario; Graefe, Andreas; Brosius, Hans-Bernd (2018). “Burst of the filter bubble?”. Digital journalism, v. 6, n. 3, pp. 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
		+
		+	IAB Spain (2017). Inversión publicitaria en medios digitales. Resultados 2017. https://iabspain.es/wp-content/uploads/inversin-publicitaria-medios-digitales_2017_vreducida.pdf
		+
		+	Jiang, Min (2014a). “Search concentration, bias, and parochialism: A comparative study of Google, Baidu, and Jike’s search results from China”. Journal of communication, v. 64, n. 6, pp. 1088-1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12126
		+
		+	Jiang, Min (2014b). “The business and politics of search engines: A comparative study of Baidu and Google’s search results of internet events in China”. New media & society, v. 16, n. 2, pp. 212-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481196
		+
		+	Kammerer, Yvonne; Bråten, Ivar; Gerjets, Peter; Strømsø, Helge I. (2013). “The role of internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons’ source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue”. Computers in human behavior, v. 29, n. 3, pp. 1193-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012
		+
		+	Kao, Evelyn (2017). “Making search results more local and relevant”. Google blog, 27 octubre. https://blog.google/products/search/making-search-results-more-local-and-relevant
		+
		+	Kleis-Nielsen, Rasmus; Ganter, Sarah-Anne (2018). “Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms”. New media & society, v. 20, n. 4, pp. 1600-1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318
		+
		+	Koed Madsen, Anders (2016). “Beyond the bubble: Three empirical reasons for re-conceptualizing online visibility”. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, v. 31, n. 59, pp. 6-27. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v31i59.19235
		+
		+	Lee, Kevin (2005). “Did‐it, Enquiro and Eyetools uncover search’s golden triangle”. PRWeb, March 1st. https://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/03/prweb213516.htm
		+
		+	León, Bienvenido; Codina, Mónica (2016). “Information and opinion in the representation of scientific consensus and skepticism on climate change in Spanish language online publications”. Observatorio (OBS*), v. 10, n. 3, pp. 104-118. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS10320161021
		+
		+	Lewandowski, Dirk (2017). “Is Google responsible for providing fair and unbiased results?”. In: Taddeo, Mariarosaria; Floridi, Luciano. The responsibilities of online service providers. Springer, Cham, pp. 61-77. ISBN: 978 3 319 47852 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_4
		+
		+	Lopezosa, Carlos; Codina, Lluís; Caldera-Serrano, Jorge (2018). “SEO semántico: Framework ISS para la optimización de sitios intensivos en contenidos”. Cuadernos de documentación multimedia, v. 29, pp. 97-122. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CDMU/article/view/60607
		+
		+	Moreno-Castro, Carolina; Lopera-Pareja, Emilia (2016). “Comparative study of the frequency of use of natural therapies among the Spanish population and their public image on digital media”. In: Procs of 14th Intl conf on public communication of science and technology (PCST). Estambul, Turquía. https://pcst.Co/archive/paper/2623
		+
		+	Noble, Safiya-Umoja (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. ISBN: 978 1 479837243
		+
		+	Novin, Alamir; Meyers, Eric (2017). “Making sense of convicting science information: Exploring bias in the search engine result page”. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conf of human information interaction and retrieval. ACM, pp. 175-184.
		+
		+	Ontsi (2017). La sociedad en Red. Informe anual 2016. https://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/content/informe-anual-la-sociedad-en-red-2016-edici%C3%B3n-2017
		+
		+	Pan, Bing; Hembrooke, Helene; Joachims, Thorsten; Lorigo, Lori; Gay, Geri; Granka, Laura (2007). “In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance”. Journal of computer-mediated communication, v. 12, n. 3, pp. 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x
		+
		+	Pasquale, Frank (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674 73606 1
		+
		+	Pías-Peleteiro, Leticia; Cortés-Bordoy, Javier; Martinón-Torres, Federico (2013). “Dr. Google: What about the human papillomavirus vaccine?”. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, v. 9, n. 8, pp. 1712-1719. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.25057
		+
		+	Pogacar, Frances; Ghenai, Amira; Smucker, Mark; Clarke, Charles L. A. (2017). “The positive and negative influence of search results on people’s decisions about the efficacy of medical treatments”. In: Kamps, Jaap; Kanoulas, Evangelos; De-Rijke, Maarten; Fang, Hui; Yilmaz, Emine. Procs of the ACM Sigir intl conf on theory of information retrieval. New York: ACM, pp. 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1145/3121050.3121074
		+
		+	Puschmann, Cornelius (2018). “Beyond the bubble: Assessing the diversity of political search results”. Digital journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626
		+
		+	Ramaswami, Prem (2015). “A remedy for your health-related questions: Health info in the knowledge graph”. Google. Official blog, Febr. 10. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/health-info-knowledge-graph.html
		+
		+	Rieder, Bernhard (2016). RankFlow. http://labs.polsys.net/tools/rankflow
		+
		+	Rieder, Bernhard; Sire, Guillaume (2014). “Conflicts of interest and incentives to bias: A microeconomic critique of Google’s tangled position on the Web”. New media & society, v. 16, n. 2, pp. 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481195
		+
		+	Roberge, Jonathan; Melançon, Louis (2017). “Being the King Kong of algorithmic culture is a tough job after all: Google’s regimes of justification and the meanings of Glass”. Convergence, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 306-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592506
		+
		+	Robertson, Ronald; Lazer, David; Wilson, Christo (2018). “Auditing the personalization and composition of politically-related search engine results pages”. In: Procs of the 2018 World Wide Web Conf on World Wide Web (pp. 955-965). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. http://personalization.ccs.neu.edu/static/pdf/robertson-www18.pdf
		+
		+	Ruiz, Jeanette B.; Bell, Robert A. (2014). “Understanding vaccination resistance: Vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information”. Vaccine, v. 32, n. 44, pp. 5776-5780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.042
		+
		+	Van-Riel, Noor; Auwerx, Koen; Debbaut, Pieterjan; Van Hees, Sanne; Schoenmakers, Birgitte (2017). “The effect of Dr. Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study”. BJGP open, v. 1, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100833
		+
		+	White, Ryen (2014). “Belief dynamics in Web search”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 11, pp. 2165-2178. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23128
		+
		+	White, Ryen; Hassan, Ahmed (2014). “Content bias in online health search”. ACM transactions on the Web (TWEB), v. 8, n. 4, pp. 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663355

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:01, 8 April 2019
(No difference)

Cano-Oron 2019b - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 15:01, 17 April 2019

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 862263963 to Cano-Oron 2019b

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Users access to Google to find out about health issues is frequent among citizens. This research analyzes the best results of three generic searches on homeop..."