https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Amoroso%2A_et_al_2024a Amoroso* et al 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-06T10:37:01Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amoroso*_et_al_2024a&diff=302054&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 178022110 to Amoroso* et al 2024a 2024-06-07T12:03:53Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_178022110" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 178022110">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 178022110</a> to <a href="/public/Amoroso*_et_al_2024a" title="Amoroso* et al 2024a">Amoroso* et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:03, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amoroso*_et_al_2024a&diff=302053&oldid=prev JSanchez at 12:03, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T12:03:44Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:03, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The presence of a non-liquefiable crust overlying a liquefiable layer plays a significant role in determining the occurrence of&#160; liquefaction damage, as originally formulated by Ishihara in 1985. Following the 2010-2011 Canterbury seismic sequence (New Zealand), almost no foundation deformation occurred in areas characterized by soils susceptible to liquefaction overlaid by at least 3 m-thick intact crust. In contrast, the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake (Italy) provided evidence of liquefaction in silty-sandy layers below 3 to 9 m-thick crusts. Therefore, Ishihara’s approach and the variety of liquefaction severity indices need to be further tested to assess to what extent they can be considered reliable predictors of performance. This study aims at better understanding the role of non-liquefiable crusts in preventing damage to buildings and infrastructures. In this respect, in situ and laboratory tests were conducted at selected sites in EmiliaRomagna. The results of two case studies in Mirandola (Modena, Italy), which share similar soil profiles but exhibited different liquefaction evidences following the 2012 seismic sequence, are presented. Comprehensive geotechnical and geophysical surveys were performed at both the sites, by means of piezocone tests, seismic dilatometer tests, boreholes, laboratory tests, electrical resistivity tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves. These surveys document the geotechnical and geophysical properties of the 5 m-thick non-liquefied (or potentially non-liquefiable) crust and of the liquefied (or potentially liquefiable) silty-sandy deposits. This effort is aimed at understanding how the surface layer properties contributed to the different behavior observed at the two sites during the earthquake events.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The presence of a non-liquefiable crust overlying a liquefiable layer plays a significant role in determining the occurrence of&#160; liquefaction damage, as originally formulated by Ishihara in 1985. Following the 2010-2011 Canterbury seismic sequence (New Zealand), almost no foundation deformation occurred in areas characterized by soils susceptible to liquefaction overlaid by at least 3 m-thick intact crust. In contrast, the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake (Italy) provided evidence of liquefaction in silty-sandy layers below 3 to 9 m-thick crusts. Therefore, Ishihara’s approach and the variety of liquefaction severity indices need to be further tested to assess to what extent they can be considered reliable predictors of performance. This study aims at better understanding the role of non-liquefiable crusts in preventing damage to buildings and infrastructures. In this respect, in situ and laboratory tests were conducted at selected sites in EmiliaRomagna. The results of two case studies in Mirandola (Modena, Italy), which share similar soil profiles but exhibited different liquefaction evidences following the 2012 seismic sequence, are presented. Comprehensive geotechnical and geophysical surveys were performed at both the sites, by means of piezocone tests, seismic dilatometer tests, boreholes, laboratory tests, electrical resistivity tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves. These surveys document the geotechnical and geophysical properties of the 5 m-thick non-liquefied (or potentially non-liquefiable) crust and of the liquefied (or potentially liquefiable) silty-sandy deposits. This effort is aimed at understanding how the surface layer properties contributed to the different behavior observed at the two sites during the earthquake events.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_178022110216.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302051:newid:302053 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amoroso*_et_al_2024a&diff=302051&oldid=prev JSanchez at 12:03, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T12:03:43Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:03, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The presence of a non-liquefiable crust overlying a liquefiable layer plays a significant role in determining the occurrence of&#160; liquefaction damage, as originally formulated by Ishihara in 1985. Following the 2010-2011 Canterbury seismic sequence (New Zealand), almost no foundation deformation occurred in areas characterized by soils susceptible to liquefaction overlaid by at least 3 m-thick intact crust. In contrast, the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake (Italy) provided evidence of liquefaction in silty-sandy layers below 3 to 9 m-thick crusts. Therefore, Ishihara’s approach and the variety of liquefaction severity indices need to be further tested to assess to what extent they can be considered reliable predictors of performance. This study aims at better understanding the role of non-liquefiable crusts in preventing damage to buildings and infrastructures. In this respect, in situ and laboratory tests were conducted at selected sites in EmiliaRomagna. The results of two case studies in Mirandola (Modena, Italy), which share similar soil profiles but exhibited different liquefaction evidences following the 2012 seismic sequence, are presented. Comprehensive geotechnical and geophysical surveys were performed at both the sites, by means of piezocone tests, seismic dilatometer tests, boreholes, laboratory tests, electrical resistivity tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves. These surveys document the geotechnical and geophysical properties of the 5 m-thick non-liquefied (or potentially non-liquefiable) crust and of the liquefied (or potentially liquefiable) silty-sandy deposits. This effort is aimed at understanding how the surface layer properties contributed to the different behavior observed at the two sites during the earthquake events.</ins></div></td></tr> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amoroso*_et_al_2024a&diff=302050&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-07T12:03:41Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez