<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Amorosi et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T20:22:26Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232707&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 485160138 to Amorosi et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232707&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:14:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_485160138&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 485160138&quot;&gt;Draft Content 485160138&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Amorosi_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Amorosi et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Amorosi et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:14, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232706&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The  development  of  urban  mobility  implies  the  construction  of  tunnels,  often   interacting  with  valuable  historical  structures.  It  is  thus  ne...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Amorosi_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232706&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:14:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The  development  of  urban  mobility  implies  the  construction  of  tunnels,  often   interacting  with  valuable  historical  structures.  It  is  thus  ne...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  development  of  urban  mobility  implies  the  construction  of  tunnels,  often  &lt;br /&gt;
interacting  with  valuable  historical  structures.  It  is  thus  necessary  to  develop  rational  and  &lt;br /&gt;
reliable procedures to estimate the potential excavation-induced damage, dealing with complex &lt;br /&gt;
soil-structure interaction problems. Classical approaches are often characterised by relatively &lt;br /&gt;
simple  schematisations  for  either  one  or  both  components  of  the  problem,  as,  for  example,  &lt;br /&gt;
springs for the soil or equivalent plates for the structure. Such simplified assumptions prove to &lt;br /&gt;
be appropriate for simple soil-foundation cases, while show several limitations when tackling &lt;br /&gt;
more complex problems, as those involving the excavation in the vicinity or beneath historical &lt;br /&gt;
masonry structure. In such cases, the need for reliable prediction of the potential damage on &lt;br /&gt;
surface  structures  induced  by  construction  activities  justifies  the  adoption  of  advanced &lt;br /&gt;
numerical approaches. These need to be based on realistic constitutive assumptions for both &lt;br /&gt;
soils  and  masonry  elements  and  require  the  definition  of  the  three-dimensional  geometry  as  &lt;br /&gt;
well  as  an  accurate  modelling  schematisation  of  the  excavation  process.  In  this  paper  a  3D  &lt;br /&gt;
Finite  Element  approach  is  proposed  to  model  in  detail  the  excavation  of  twin  tunnels,  &lt;br /&gt;
accounting for the strongly non-linear soil behaviour, interacting with monumental masonry &lt;br /&gt;
structures, carefully modelling their geometry and non-linear anisotropic mechanical &lt;br /&gt;
behaviour. The work focuses on a specific case-study related to the ongoing construction of the &lt;br /&gt;
line C of Rome underground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_485160138p973.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1]  Rampello S., Callisto L., Viggiani G., Soccodato F.M. Evaluating the effects of tunnelling  on  historical  buildings:  the  example  of  a  new  subway  in  Rome.  Geomechanics  and   tunnelling (2012) 5(3): 275-299.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]  Amorosi,  A.,  Boldini,  D.,  de  Felice,  G.,  Malena,  M.  and  Sebastianelli,  M.  Tunnelling-induced deformation and damage on historical masonry structures. Géotechnique  (2014) 64(2):118-130.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]  Brinkgreve, R. B. J., et al. &amp;quot;PLAXIS 2016.&amp;quot; PLAXIS bv, the Netherlands (2016).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]  Fargnoli, V., Gragnano, C.G., Boldini, D. and Amorosi, A. 3D numerical modelling of soil–structure interaction during EPB tunnelling. Géotechnique (2015) 65(1):23-37.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]  Burghignoli A., Callisto L., Rampello S., Soccodato F.M., Viggiani G.M.B. The crossing  of the historical centre of Rome by the new underground Line C: a study of soil structure- interaction  for  historical  buildings.  In  Geotechnics  and  Heritage:  Case  Histories,  CRC   Press, London (2013), pp. 97-136   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]  Benz,  T.  Small-strain  stiffness  of  soils  and  its  numerical  consequences.  Ph.D.  thesis,  Universität Stuttgart (2007).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]  Schanz, T., Vermeer, P.A. and Bonnier. P. G. The hardening soil model: formulation and  verification. Beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics (1999): 281-296.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]  Rampello  S.,  Fantera  L.  and  Masini  L.  Efficiency  of  embedded  barriers  to  mitigate  tunnelling effects. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology (2019) 89:109-124.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]  Lasciarrea, W.G., Amorosi, A., Boldini, D., de Felice, G. and Malena, M. Jointed Masonry Model: A constitutive law for 3D soil-structure interaction analysis. Engineering  Structures (2019) 201.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] Sangirardi, M., Malena, M. and de Felice, G. Settlement Induced Crack Pattern Prediction Through the Jointed Masonry Model. In Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019,  Springer International Publishing 24 (2020), pp. 1971-1980.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] Boscardin, M. D., and Cording, E. J. Building response to excavation-induced settlement.  Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (1989) 115(1): 1-21.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Sangirardi,  M.,  Amorosi,  A.  and  de  Felice,  G.  A  coupled  structural  and  geotechnical  assessment of the effects of a landslide on an ancient monastery in Central  Italy. Engineering Structures (2020) 225.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>