Amaldi Smoker 2012a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 10:53, 25 January 2021

2021-01-25T10:53:42Z

Scipediacontent at 15:18, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T15:18:39Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 341476089 to Amaldi Smoker 2012a

2020-10-14T13:35:44Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 341476089 to Amaldi Smoker 2012a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications International audience Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to..."

2020-10-14T13:35:41Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications International audience Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications International audience Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to be missing is a reflection at the organizational or societal level about a policy of automation. By this we intend appropriate declarations made at the level of rationale, future plans and strategies to achieve intended goals and most importantly how those achievements will impact on various aspects of societal life, from legal responsibilities to moral and socio economic issues. In some public spheres these issues are becoming quite controversial because automation opens up possibilities of profound structural re-organization; however, we lack a discussion across and within different work domains to help us review methods or even methodological principles needed to gather and organize knowledge towards the construction of automation policies. This paper uses the UK service organization for Air Traffic Management Domain called NATS National Air traffic Service, as a case study to illustrate an example of an organization currently undertaking critical self-reflection about automation policy or lack of such, along with the illustration of some unresolved deep concerns raised by the development, introduction, and continued use of automation.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_341476089-beopen816-8320-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 25 January 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Full document ==		== Full document ==
−	<pdf>Media:Amaldi_Smoker_2012a-~~beopen1716~~-~~8915~~-document.pdf</pdf>	+	<pdf>Media:Amaldi_Smoker_2012a-beopen1388-5193-document.pdf</pdf>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 == Abstract ==
-Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications  International audience  Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to be missing is a reflection at the organizational or societal level about a policy of automation. By this we intend appropriate declarations made at the level of rationale, future plans and strategies to achieve intended goals and most importantly how those achievements will impact on various aspects of societal life, from legal responsibilities to moral and socio economic issues. In some public spheres these issues are becoming quite controversial because automation opens up possibilities of profound structural re-organization; however, we lack a discussion across and within different work domains to help us review methods or even methodological principles needed to gather and organize knowledge towards the construction of automation policies. This paper uses the UK service organization for Air Traffic Management Domain called NATS  National Air traffic Service, as a case study to illustrate an example of an organization currently undertaking critical self-reflection about automation policy or lack of such, along with the illustration of some unresolved deep concerns raised by the development, introduction, and continued use of automation.
+Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications; International audience; Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to be missing is a reflection at the organizational or societal level about a policy of automation. By this we intend appropriate declarations made at the level of rationale, future plans and strategies to achieve intended goals and most importantly how those achievements will impact on various aspects of societal life, from legal responsibilities to moral and socio economic issues. In some public spheres these issues are becoming quite controversial because automation opens up possibilities of profound structural re-organization; however, we lack a discussion across and within different work domains to help us review methods or even methodological principles needed to gather and organize knowledge towards the construction of automation policies. This paper uses the UK service organization for Air Traffic Management Domain called NATS â National Air traffic Service, as a case study to illustrate an example of an organization currently undertaking critical self-reflection about automation policy or lack of such, along with the illustration of some unresolved deep concerns raised by the development, introduction, and continued use of automation.
 Document type: Part of book or chapter of book
 == Full document ==
-<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_341476089-beopen816-8320-document.pdf</pdf>
+<pdf>Media:Amaldi_Smoker_2012a-beopen1716-8915-document.pdf</pdf>
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:35, 14 October 2020
(No difference)