Abomhara et al 2019a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 14:32, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T14:32:28Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 282963186 to Abomhara et al 2019a

2020-10-14T13:08:14Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 282963186 to Abomhara et al 2019a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Complying with the European Union (EU) perspective on human rights goes or should go together with handling ethical, social and legal challenges arising due t..."

2020-10-14T13:08:11Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Complying with the European Union (EU) perspective on human rights goes or should go together with handling ethical, social and legal challenges arising due t..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Complying with the European Union (EU) perspective on human rights goes or should go together with handling ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology as border control technology. While there is no doubt that the biometrics technology at European borders is a valuable element of border control systems, these technologies lead to issues of fundamental rights and personal privacy, among others. This paper discusses various ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology in border control. First, a set of specific challenges and values affected were identified and then, generic considerations related to mitigation of these issues within a framework is provided. The framework is expected to meet the emergent need for supplying interoperability among multiple information systems used for border control. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_282963186-beopen719-8094-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7]

* [http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2643776 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2643776]

* [https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 21 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Complying with the European Union (EU) perspective on human rights goes or should go together with handling ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology as border control technology. While there is no doubt that the biometrics technology at European borders is a valuable element of border control systems, these technologies lead to issues of fundamental rights and personal privacy, among others. This paper discusses various ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology in border control. First, a set of specific challenges and values affected were identified and then, generic considerations related to mitigation of these issues within a framework is provided. The framework is expected to meet the emergent need for supplying interoperability among multiple information systems used for border control. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7		Complying with the European Union (EU) perspective on human rights goes or should go together with handling ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology as border control technology. While there is no doubt that the biometrics technology at European borders is a valuable element of border control systems, these technologies lead to issues of fundamental rights and personal privacy, among others. This paper discusses various ethical, social and legal challenges arising due to the use of biometrics technology in border control. First, a set of specific challenges and values affected were identified and then, generic considerations related to mitigation of these issues within a framework is provided. The framework is expected to meet the emergent need for supplying interoperability among multiple information systems used for border control. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7
−
−	~~Document type: Part of book or chapter of book~~
−
−	~~== Full document ==~~
−	~~<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_282963186-beopen719-8094-document.pdf</pdf>~~


Line 19:		Line 14:

	* [https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf]		* [https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/11250/2643776/4/Abomhara.pdf]
		+
		+	* [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7],
		+	: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
		+
		+	* [https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2643776 https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2643776],
		+	: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_7],
		+	: [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/edemocracy/edemocracy2019.html#AbomharaYNSSE19 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/edemocracy/edemocracy2019.html#AbomharaYNSSE19],
		+	: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2993680840 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2993680840]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:08, 14 October 2020
(No difference)