Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 485124081 to A. Brencich 2021a

2021-11-30T11:52:23Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 485124081 to A. Brencich 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == The Hennebique system was the most successful among the patented systems in the pre-code period even though the design rules were not completely clear. Anchor..."

2021-11-30T11:52:20Z

Created page with "== Abstract == The Hennebique system was the most successful among the patented systems in the pre-code period even though the design rules were not completely clear. Anchor..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The Hennebique system was the most successful among the patented systems in the
pre-code period even though the design rules were not completely clear. Anchorage of the re-
inforcement is one of these unknown aspects and how it was calculated, and if it was
calculated at all, is still today not clear. For this reason, the efficiency of the anchorages is one
of the major issues when dealing with retrofitting a Hennebique structure or when its safety
needs to be evaluated. In this paper a series of tests have been performed on the typical Hennebique an-chorages for reinforcing bars (fish-tails) and for the plate stirrups (bended ends) that were used. Different concrete types have been used so that either the collapse mechanisms of the anchor-ages and their ultimate strength may be identified.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_485124081p1205.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] Cusack P. François Hennebique: The Specialist Organisation and the Success of Ferro-Concrete: 1892–1909, Trans. of the Newcomen Soc., 56:1, 1984, 71-86.

[2] Mc Beth D.G. François Hennebique (1842–1921), reinforced concrete pioneer, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.s, 126 May, 1998, 86-95

[3] Delhumeau G. L'invention du béton armé : Hennebique 1890-1914, Norma, Paris, 1999

[4] Hellebois A. Theoretical and experimental studies on early reinforced concrete structures. Contri-bution to the analysis of the bearing capacity of the Hennebique system, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, 2013.

[5] Cusack P. Agents of change: Hennebique, Mouchel, and ferro-concrete in Britain, 1897–1908. Construction History 3, 1987, 61–74.

[6] Borden A.H. Identifying early reinforced concrete buildings in Scotland. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.s – Eng. History and Heritage 163 (3), 2010, 147–167.

[7] Hellebois A and Espion B. Domination of commercial patents in the evolution of early reinforced concrete. Case study of the region of Brussels. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Str. Anal. of Historic Con-str.s: Strengthening and Retroffiting, 2010, Gu X & Song X ed.s. – Adv. Mat.s Res., Shanghai, China, vol. 133, pp. 119–124.

[8] de Courcy J.W. The emergence of reinforced concrete, 1750–1910. The Str. Eng. 65 (9), 1987, 315–322

[9] Kierdorf A. Why Hennebique failed in Germany. Strategies and obstacles in the introduction of a new construction technology, Proc. 3rd Int. Cong. On Constr. History, Cottbus, May 2009, Brandenburg University of Technology, K.H.Kurrer, Lorenz W. and Wetsk V. ed.s, NEUNPLUS1, Berlin.

[10] Marcos, I., San José, J.T., Cuadrado, J., (2014). The patents in the introduction of reinforced concrete in Spain: “Alhóndiga de Bilbao” case study (in Spanish). Informes de la Construcción, 66(534), 2014,

[11] Ragot G. The Hennebique Archives: toward a new corpus for contemporary architectural history. The American Archivist, 59 (2), 1996, 214-220.

[12] Nelva R., Signorelli B. Beginning and evolution of reinforced concrete in Italy: the Hennebique system (in Italian), AITEC, Milan, 1990

[13] Sanna A., First applications of reinforced concrete in Sardinia. The “Porcheddu Company Engineering S.A.” and his plan archives. Proc. 1st Int. Congr. on Constr. History, 2003, Huerta S., de Herrera I.J., Benvenuto E., Dragados F., 1809-1820.

[14] Iori T., Reinforced Concrete in Italy (in Italian), Edilstampa, Rome, 2001.

[15] Guidi C., Constructions in Beton Armeé (in Italian), appendix to Lessons on Structural Mechanics, Bona ed. Turin, 1907.

[16] Souponitski S.Z., Sniatkov S.V., Grigoriev S.E. Early reinforced concrete construction in Russia: specific faults and causes of failure, Eng. Fail. Anal., 8, 2001, 201-212.

[17] Mueller G., Rankin G.I.B. The Hennebique system: a Renaissance? Proc. of the Inst. of Civ. Eng.s, 90 (1), 1991, 179–187.

[18] Hellebois A., Launoy A., Pierre C., De Lanève M., Espion B. 100-year-old Hennebique concrete, from composition to performance, Constr. & Build. Mat.s, 44, 2013, 149-160.

[19] Hellebois A., Espion B. Structural weaknesses of the Hennebique early reinforced concrete system and possible retrofitting. Str. Eng.ng Int., 23(4), 2013, 501–511

[20] Hellebois A., Espion B. Tests up to failure of a reinforced concrete Hennebique T-beam, Proc. of the Inst. of Civ. Eng.s - Structures and Buildings, 167 (2), 2014, 81-93.

[21] Foti D. Shear vulnerability of historical reinforced-concrete structures. Int. J. of Arch. Her., 9(4), 2015, 453–467.

[22] Palmisano F. A preliminary study on shear capacity of historical reinforced concrete beams, Int. J. of Her. Arch., 1 (4), 2017, 608-623.

[23] Christophe P. Reinforced Concrete and its applications (in French), Paris, Beranger ed., 1902

[24] The Porcheddu Document and Photographic Archive, Technical University of Turin, Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Eng.ng.

[25] Panetti M., Swiss issues on reinforced concrete constructions (in Italian), Civil Engineering and Industrial Arts, XXVIII (17), Bertolero ed.s, Turin, 1902.

[26] Gotelli R. (1915) Doubling Genova Brignole – Quarto dei Mille with deviation to Sturla, Italian Railways, work area, special office for doubling the line Genova-Spezia, Italian Railways ed., 1915

[27] Hennebique U.S. patent n. 611907, 4th of October 1898.

[28] Porcheddu Archive, Dossier Genova, 1897, n. 38/1506, Oriental Market

[29] Porcheddu Archive – Dossier Genova 1896, n. 15/879, Giant Palace

[30] W.B. Fuller, S.E. Thompson, The laws of proportioning concrete, Trans. ASCE 59, (1907) 67–143.

[31] EN 1992-1-1:2004/A1:2014 - EuroCode 2 – Desing of Concrete Structures. General rules and rules for buildings.

[32] ASTM C192/C192M-18 Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory.

[33] EN 12390-2: 2019 Testing hardened concrete. Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests.

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:52, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

A. Brencich 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 485124081 to A. Brencich 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == The Hennebique system was the most successful among the patented systems in the pre-code period even though the design rules were not completely clear. Anchor..."