<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Scipedia: Collection of Articles on Medicine]]></title>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/sj/view/24134</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.scipedia.com/sj/view/24134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<div id="documents_content"><script>var journal_guid = 24134;</script><item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Vanegas-Mondragon_Tellez-Tellez_2025b</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 09:07:02 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Vanegas-Mondragon_Tellez-Tellez_2025b</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Endovascular Therapy Versus Surgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; font-size: 12pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400;">Intracranial aneurysms are a leading cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, microsurgical clipping was the gold standard, but endovascular coiling has emerged as a less invasive alternative. This review synthesizes current evidence comparing endovascular and surgical approaches. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published between 2000 and 2025. Outcomes assessed were mortality, functional independence, perioperative complications, recurrence, and retreatment rates. Twenty-seven studies encompassing 18,560 patients were analyzed. Endovascular therapy demonstrated reduced short-term mortality and higher rates of functional independence, particularly in elderly patients and those with posterior circulation aneurysms. Conversely, surgical clipping ensured greater long-term durability with fewer retreatments, especially among younger patients. Both techniques carry unique benefits and limitations; thus, treatment should be individualized, taking into account aneurysm morphology, patient age, comorbidities, and surgical risk. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane RoB2 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies, with most studies showing moderate risk. This review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach, while emphasizing the need for future long-term RCTs and device innovations. In conclusion, endovascular therapy provides superior early safety, while surgical clipping ensures durable occlusion; an evidence-based, personalized strategy remains essential to optimize patient outcomes.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Claudia-Andrea Vanegas-Mondragon</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Vanegas-Mondragon_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 06:33:23 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Vanegas-Mondragon_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Role of Robotic Surgery in General Surgery: Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Background: Robotic surgery is an important advancement in minimally invasive surgery, providing enhanced precision, ergonomics, and visualization compared to laparoscopy. Its increasing adoption in general surgery reflects both its potential and its limitations.</p><p>Objective: To review the current role of robotic surgery in general surgery, emphasizing advances, limitations, and future perspectives.</p><p>Methods: A narrative review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2020-2023). Search terms included &ldquo;robotic surgery,&rdquo; &ldquo;general surgery,&rdquo; &ldquo;da Vinci system,&rdquo; and &ldquo;cost-effectiveness.&rdquo; Priority was given to guidelines, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.</p><p>Results: Robotic surgery shows advantages in ergonomics, dexterity, visualization, and conversion rates, particularly in colorectal, hernia, and hepatopancreatobiliary procedures.</p><p>Limitations include high cost, limited access, absence of haptic feedback, and the need for structured training. Emerging technologies such as novel robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality suggest promising directions.</p><p>Conclusions: Robotic surgery improves outcomes but requires addressing cost, access, and training challenges.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Claudia-Andrea Vanegas-Mondragon</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Draft_Mondragon_146685178</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 04:49:23 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Draft_Mondragon_146685178</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Role of Robotic Surgery in General Surgery: Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Background:</strong> Robotic surgery is an important advancement in minimally invasive surgery, providing enhanced precision, ergonomics, and visualization compared to laparoscopy. Its increasing adoption in general surgery reflects both its potential and its limitations.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Objective:</strong> To review the current role of robotic surgery in general surgery, emphasizing advances, limitations, and future perspectives.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Methods:</strong> A narrative review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2020&ndash;2023). Search terms included &ldquo;robotic surgery,&rdquo; &ldquo;general surgery,&rdquo; &ldquo;da Vinci system,&rdquo; and &ldquo;cost-effectiveness.&rdquo; Priority was given to guidelines, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Results:</strong> Robotic surgery shows advantages in ergonomics, dexterity, visualization, and conversion rates, particularly in colorectal, hernia, and hepatopancreatobiliary procedures. Limitations include high cost, limited access, absence of haptic feedback, and the need for structured training. Emerging technologies such as novel robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality suggest promising directions.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Robotic surgery improves outcomes but requires addressing cost, access, and training challenges.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><strong>Keywords:</strong>&nbsp;robotic surgery; general surgery; minimally invasive surgery; da Vinci system; cost-effectiveness; surgical training; future perspectives</span></span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Claudia-Andrea Vanegas-Mondragon</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Claudia_et_al_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 07:24:36 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Claudia_et_al_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and patient-reported quality of life outcomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>&#39;&#39;&#39;Objective&#39;&#39;&#39;: To synthesize contemporary evidence (2015&ndash;2025) comparing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction techniques&mdash;including prepectoral and subpectoral implants, as well as autologous flaps (DIEP, TRAM, latissimus dorsi)&mdash;focusing on patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and safety outcomes. &#39;&#39;&#39;Methods&#39;&#39;&#39;: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus for studies published between January 2015 and August 2025. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies. The primary outcome was QoL assessed with the BREAST-Q instrument. Secondary outcomes included complications (implant loss, capsular contracture), reoperations, and the impact of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for observational studies. &#39;&#39;&#39;Results&#39;&#39;&#39;: Autologous reconstruction consistently achieved higher long-term BREAST-Q scores compared with implant-based techniques, despite longer recovery times. Prepectoral implant placement reduced animation deformity and capsular contracture relative to subpectoral reconstruction, with similar overall complication rates but increased rippling and seroma in selected cohorts. PMRT significantly increased the risks of implant loss and severe capsular contracture, favoring autologous approaches in patients requiring radiotherapy. BREAST-Q remains the gold standard PROM, with updated multilingual validations enhancing cross-cultural applicability. &#39;&#39;&#39;Conclusions&#39;&#39;&#39;: Autologous flaps offer sustained QoL benefits in selected candidates. Prepectoral implant reconstruction, with or without acellular dermal matrix, is safe and effective, particularly in non-PMRT settings. Shared decision-making guided by BREAST-Q and aligned with NCCN/ESMO guidelines is essential.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Ximena Lozano</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Lozano_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:18:33 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Lozano_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Use of Indocyanine Green in Colorectal Surgery: Perfusion Assessment and Prevention of Anastomotic Leaks. A Systematic Review.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Objective: To evaluate the role of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) in colorectal surgery for perfusion assessment and prevention of anastomotic leaks. Methods: A systematic review of medical databases (2020&ndash;2025) identified randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses reporting outcomes of ICG-FA in colorectal resections. Results: Major RCTs demonstrated that ICG-FA modified intraoperative strategy in 10&ndash;20% of cases. While some large multicenter trials found no significant reduction in overall leak rates, consistent benefits were observed in low rectal anastomoses and high-risk subgroups. Meta-analyses confirmed a modest absolute reduction in leaks (2&ndash;3%), with observational studies highlighting improved reproducibility when using quantitative fluorescence metrics. Emerging approaches, such as intraluminal ICG-FA, showed promise in detecting hypoperfusion. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggested potential savings from reduced complications and reoperations.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Ximena Lozano</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Lozano_2025b</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:27:22 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Lozano_2025b</link>
	<title><![CDATA[''Appendicitis during Pregnancy: A Narrative Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Approaches'']]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>&#39;&#39;&#39;Background:&#39;&#39;&#39; Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. The choice between laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) remains controversial due to maternal and fetal safety concerns. &#39;&#39;&#39;Objective:&#39;&#39;&#39; To analyze current evidence comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant women. &#39;&#39;&#39;Methods:&#39;&#39;&#39; A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Elsevier, and ClinicalKey. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies published between 2000 and 2023 were included. &#39;&#39;&#39;Results:&#39;&#39;&#39; LA was associated with shorter hospital stay, fewer wound infections, and faster recovery compared to OA. Earlier meta-analyses suggested a slightly higher risk of fetal loss with LA (OR ~1.7), but more recent studies and sensitivity analyses demonstrated no significant differences. LA is increasingly considered safe throughout all trimesters when performed with appropriate surgical technique and intraoperative monitoring. &#39;&#39;&#39;Conclusions:&#39;&#39;&#39; Laparoscopic appendectomy provides maternal benefits and comparable fetal safety to open surgery. The choice of surgical approach should be guided by surgeon expertise and institutional resources.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Ximena Lozano</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Prado_Junco_2025c</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 01:20:13 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Prado_Junco_2025c</link>
	<title><![CDATA[DOENÇA POLICÍSTICA DO FÍGADO ASSOCIADA A DOENÇA POLICÍSTICA RENAL: RELATO DE CASO NA ATENÇÃO BÁSICA E REVISÃO DA LITERATURA]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span><span>A Doen&ccedil;a Polic&iacute;stica do F&iacute;gado (DPF) &eacute; caracterizada pela forma&ccedil;&atilde;o de m&uacute;ltiplos cistos hep&aacute;ticos e pode se apresentar de forma isolada ou associada &agrave; Doen&ccedil;a Renal Polic&iacute;stica Autoss&ocirc;mica Dominante (DRPAD). A maioria dos casos &eacute; assintom&aacute;tica, mas alguns pacientes desenvolvem sintomas compressivos e complica&ccedil;&otilde;es. Este trabalho descreve um caso cl&iacute;nico de DPF diagnosticado incidentalmente em paciente sintom&aacute;tica e realiza uma revis&atilde;o cr&iacute;tica da literatura recente, enfatizando aspectos etiol&oacute;gicos, fisiopatol&oacute;gicos e terap&ecirc;uticos da doen&ccedil;a.</span></span></span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Vicente Leonides Prado Junco</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Prado_Junco_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 03:19:23 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Prado_Junco_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA['''Título:''' Interfaces entre Prática e Formação: Desempenho Profissional e Aquisição de Conhecimento na Pós-Graduação em Medicina de Família e Comunidade - Experiência como tutor. SP - Brasil]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Vicente Leonides Prado Junco</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Elizabeth_et_al_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:58:03 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Elizabeth_et_al_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CARACTERIZACIÓN DE CÉLULAS MADRE DEL CORDÓN UMBILICAL EN EL ESTADO DE CHIHUAHUA]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>El presente estudio tuvo un enfoque cuantitativo, con muestreo no probabil&iacute;stico por cuotas, cuyo objetivo fue identificar el grado de conocimiento que tienen las gestantes del estado de Chihuahua respecto a los beneficios de las c&eacute;lulas madre del cord&oacute;n umbilical, as&iacute; como su disposici&oacute;n. respecto a la donaci&oacute;n y con ganas de recibir m&aacute;s informaci&oacute;n. La muestra estuvo constituida por 123 mujeres embarazadas aleatorias, en cualquier trimestre del embarazo, a cualquier edad, siempre que estuvieran disponibles. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante la realizaci&oacute;n de encuestas presenciales o telef&oacute;nicas. Como resultado, la mayor&iacute;a de las gestantes participantes ten&iacute;an cero conocimiento sobre el cord&oacute;n umbilical, las c&eacute;lulas madre, sus beneficios y utilidad. Sin embargo, la mayor&iacute;a present&oacute; una actitud positiva respecto a la donaci&oacute;n del cord&oacute;n umbilical y con ganas de recibir m&aacute;s informaci&oacute;n. En conclusi&oacute;n, se observa la necesidad de realizar m&aacute;s investigaciones dentro del estado de Chihuahua, con el fin de normalizar la utilidad de las c&eacute;lulas madre del cord&oacute;n umbilical y que la poblaci&oacute;n tenga conocimiento sobre su afectaci&oacute;n, y est&eacute; dentro de sus opciones de tratamiento en cualquier patolog&iacute;a.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Esmeralda Elizabeth Dominguez Ortiz</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Arbelaez-Alvarez_et_al_2025a</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:12:02 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Arbelaez-Alvarez_et_al_2025a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive approach, basic-clinical-psychosocial, for respiratory diseases (SARS-CoV-2 model)]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Clinical manifestations in patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have been reported and its management has been suggested and followed by different international protocols. Due to the nature of the pandemic, the World Health Organization was active from the beginning of the epidemiological event and the different national entities throughout the world shared success stories in relation to treatment. Considering diagnostic and treatment tools, not only for this viral manifestation in the world, it is advisable to make a comprehensive evaluation of the challenge faced by health administration entities. The study and management of the medical event from different fields of knowledge offers a greater number of possibilities in the health management system, which can lead to a more efficient treatment of the disease. This review is highlights the importance of the analysis of SARS-CoV-2, focused on clinical, molecular and psychosocial aspects. With the search equations developed in different databases and search engines, more than 1,450 documents were found that had common characteristics. With the use of delimitation tools, 47 documents were analyzed and reported, highlighting the importance of a multidimensional analysis of an epidemiological event.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Juan Carlos Carmona-Hernandez</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Draft_Canon_363707717</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 21:14:02 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Draft_Canon_363707717</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Relación entre el Trastorno por Déficit de Atención e Hiperactividad y síntomas afectivos en estudiantes universitarios de un programa de Medicina de Manizales Caldas]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre dir="ltr" id="tw-target-text" style="font-size: 28px; background-color: rgb(248, 249, 250); padding: 2px 0.14em 2px 0px; margin-top: -2px; margin-bottom: -2px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-style: normal; font-weight: 400;">

&nbsp;</pre><pre>
Introduction: Previous studies have reported high comorbidity between ADHD and anxiety and depressive spectrum disorders, however, few studies have been carried out on the subject in young university students. The present study evaluated the relationship between ADHD and the presence of depressive and anxious symptoms in university students from a medicine program in Manizales.</pre><pre>

&nbsp;</pre><pre>
Materials and methods: Observational, analytical, cross-sectional research. Sample: 362 university students from a medical program. Instruments used: CAGE questionnaire, Beck&#39;s depression and anxiety scale, DSM-5 checklist for ADHD.</pre><pre>
Results: Average age of 20.32 years. Of the total population 3.3% of a history of ADHD, of which 1.9% of treatment received. 56.36% symptoms current inattentive symptoms, 4.4% impulsive and hyperactive symptoms and 4.4% combined subtype. The absence of depressive symptoms according to the Beck scale is associated with symptoms of absence of inactive symptoms (Pvalor = 0.000), impulsive and hyperactive symptoms (Pvalor = 0.000) and mixed symptoms according to DMS-5 (Pvalor = 0.000). As the severity of depressive symptoms increases, inattentive symptoms, impulsive and hyperactive symptoms, and DSM-5 mixed symptoms increase (Pvalor = 0.000). A significant association was found between the presence of anxious symptoms and inattentive, impulsive, hyperactive and mixed symptoms according to the DSM-5 (Pvalor = 0.000).</pre><pre>

&nbsp;</pre><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: ADHD symptoms are associated with the presence of anxious symptoms and depressive symptoms in university students of a medical program</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Sandra Cañón</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:13:02 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta suicida en adolescentes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>El suicidio es un fen&oacute;meno social complejo, tambi&eacute;n reconocido como un problema de salud p&uacute;blica y mental, cuya pre-valencia y morbilidad en la poblaci&oacute;n ha incrementado, especialmente en la poblaci&oacute;n adolescente, siendo la segunda causa de muerte de este grupo etario.</p><p>Se estima que m&aacute;s de 800.000 personas mueren al a&ntilde;o a causa del suicidio a nivel mundial. Por cada suicidio es probable que m&aacute;s de 20 personas hayan tenido un intento suicida. En cuanto a Colombia, durante 2017 se detectaron 83,62 intentos de suicidio por cada 100.000 habitantes. Mientras que en Manizales se presentaron 39 casos de auto-lesiones por intento de suicidio, y una tasa de 10,43 eventos por cada 100.000 habitantes, con tendencia al incremento.</p><p>La conducta suicida corresponde a los s&iacute;ntomas o comportamientos que el individuo presenta, antes de tener un intento suicida, siendo manifestada de manera verbal y no verbal. Diversos factores de riesgo interact&uacute;an entre s&iacute;, para generar una conducta suicida, y dar origen al suicidio, los cuales pueden ser biol&oacute;gicos, sociales, e individuales.</p><p>Siendo la conducta suicida un dato observacional, para detener la mortalidad por suicidio a nivel mundial, es relevante conocer los factores de riesgo asociados, para una detecci&oacute;n temprana e intervenci&oacute;n oportuna.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Esmeralda Elizabeth Dominguez Ortiz</dc:creator>
</item>
</div>
</channel>
</rss>