<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Scipedia: 12th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (SAHC)]]></title>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/sj/sahc2021</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.scipedia.com/sj/sahc2021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<div id="documents_content"><script>var journal_guid = 268208;</script><a id='index-272585'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272585'>Conservation of 20th c. architectural heritage<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-up pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272585'><item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/P. Brugnera_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:51:48 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/P. Brugnera_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[An Innovative Shell Structure in Codogno (Italy). Evaluation of Structural and Seismic Performance]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The saddle-shaped shells, or hyperbolic paraboloids, often joined together to form a pitched roof or an inverted umbrella, were used by many pioneers in structural architecture, such as F&eacute;lix Candela, which introduced a very innovative use of reinforced concrete in thin layers or together with some reticulated ribs. An innovative semi-prefabricated building system was developed in Italy in the years &rsquo;30 of XX cent by a very active brick factory near Piacenza, RDB: the SAP system, that allowed building curved surfaces by prefabricating light elements. After WW2, this technique was applied also for the new structures covering wide spaces for the developing industry or also for public leisure, using prefabricated panels of the desired length. A particularly interesting application was the BISAP (double-SAP) panel that could be adapted for building large shells. In Codogno (LO), Italy, the BISAP panels were employed to cover a large sports hall, spanning about 37 &times; 26 m, without intermediate supports, resting (mainly) on the four corner pillars. Border pitch beams sustain at the top two crossed beams that separate (and support) the four hypar fields. On the four sides, two rafter beams are connected by horizontal prestressed tie beams, in order to minimize displacements and assure the preservation of the original shape. The first aim of the structural analysis was to assess the static conditions of the roof under the service loads assigned by Italian code for SLS, and then to evaluate seismic vulnerability at ULS of the whole sports hall, being a public space subjected to particular safety provisions. The FE code used (Straus7) allowed a very careful discretization of the orthotropic slab with the correct inclination and twist of the ribs, giving a reliable forecast of the behavior also in seismic conditions: the dynamic analysis of the modal shapes gives a satisfactory response of the shell, which maintains nearly unchanged his shape during free vibration modes. The seismic safety of the structure can be then increased by simply augmenting the stiffness of the four corner supports, where shear action is concentrated, by adding ribs to the L-shaped sections to form cross shaped ones. In this way also the slenderness (and weakness) of additional intermediated pillars could be overcome.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/A. Brencich_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:52:19 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/A. Brencich_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Anchorage of Reinforcement Bars in Hennebique R.C. Structures]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The Hennebique system was the most successful among the patented systems in the pre-code period even though the design rules were not completely clear. Anchorage of the re- inforcement is one of these unknown aspects and how it was calculated, and if it was calculated at all, is still today not clear. For this reason, the efficiency of the anchorages is one of the major issues when dealing with retrofitting a Hennebique structure or when its safety needs to be evaluated. In this paper a series of tests have been performed on the typical Hennebique an-chorages for reinforcing bars (fish-tails) and for the plate stirrups (bended ends) that were used. Different concrete types have been used so that either the collapse mechanisms of the anchor-ages and their ultimate strength may be identified.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ceravolo_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:15:39 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ceravolo_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Challenges in the Reuse and Upgrade of Pier Luigi Nervi‘s Structures]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>The  paper  presents  the  overall  objectives  of  a  funded  research  program  for  the <br />development  of  a  Conservation  Plan  (CP)  for the  two  halls  by  Pier Luigi  Nervi  of  the  Turin <br />Exhibition  Center. The  Turin Exhibition  Center  was  conceived  immediately  after  the  Second <br />World War to host primarily the annual Automobile Show, in connection with the presence in <br />Turin of the FIAT motor company. The two main pavilions of the Center (Halls B and C) are <br />outstanding  examples  of  a  pioneering  use,  of  new  advanced  methods  in  reinforced  concrete <br />construction, combining innovative prefabrication procedures and the re-invention by Nervi of <br />ferrocement, used to form extremely thin elements. The CP is expected to push and contribute <br />to the preservation of the halls designed and built by Nervi, with special emphasis on structural <br />and  seismic  vulnerability  aspects,  also  due  to  concerns  raised  on  the  durability  of  concrete <br />materials  and  technologies.  Re-using  these  buildings  entails  the  challenge  to  guarantee  new <br />extended  service  life  to  concrete  structures  built many  decades  ago  and  faces  the  need  for  a<br />seismic assessment of these structures, in compliance to recent Italian standards.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Georgiou_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:44 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Georgiou_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Conservation of 20th Century Concrete Heritage Structures in Cyprus: Research and Practice]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>The  conservation  of  20th  century  concrete  heritage  structures  poses  a  major <br />challenge  worldwide. Whilst these structures possess a remarkable architectural value <br />and  a  rather experimental character in terms of the use of materials and technologies, at the <br />same time there is admittedly lack of recognition of their cultural and historical value by the <br />wide public. More often than not, such buildings are left to deteriorate and often they are even <br />demolished. This paper follows the workings of the project “CONSErvation of 20th  century <br />concrete Cultural Heritage  in  urban  changing  environments”  (CONSECH20).  The <br />aforementioned international interdisciplinary project aims to investigate concrete <br />constructions built until 1965 in four  different  European  countries  (Cyprus,  Italy,  The <br />Netherlands  and  the  Czech  Republic),  in  terms  of  their  architectural,  social  and  historical <br />value,  and  to  address  their  restoration  and  re-use  potential. The paper initially presents <br />the significance of 20th  century concrete heritage structures in general, and describes the <br />methodology proposed in order to ensure the protection of  such  buildings  from  demolition, <br />and  facilitate  their restoration and  re-use (if  and  where  possible)  for  the  benefit  of  the <br />society.  The  focus  is  on  the  structural  assessment  and  restoration  of  20th  century  concrete <br />heritage buildings in Cyprus, following the methodologies described by modern codes for the <br />assessment  and  retrofit  of  existing  concrete  structures.  A  new  practical  analysis  approach  is <br />described  and  compared  to  the  force-control  approach  of  the  pushover analysis of Eurocode <br />8:3, which significantly overestimates the demands for seismic upgrading. The two <br />aforementioned approaches are examined for  a specific case study  concrete heritage building <br />in Nicosia, Cyprus.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Bucur-Horvath_Virag_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:18:01 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Bucur-Horvath_Virag_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Conservation of Historical Reinforced Concrete Structures]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>During the 20th century, reinforced concrete brought historical structural systems <br />back  into  modern  times,  transforming  them  into  high-performance  structures.  Reflection  on <br />early reinforced concrete structures of two ancient structural systems, the dome and the girder, <br />is  presented  through  two  Transylvanian  monuments:  the  reinforced  concrete  cupola  of  the <br />Hungarian  Theater  of  Cluj,  the  earliest  structure of  this type,  and  the  one-way  hollow  block <br />slabs of Villa Tataru designed as a duet, by Gio Ponti and Elsie Lazar. Diagnosis and therapy <br />of the hundred-year  old,  “new”  historical  structures  are  described. Uncovering these <br />remarkable, but nearly unknown buildings, the paper intends to contribute to the understanding <br />of  cultural  heritage  and  to  raise  public  awareness  towards  the  fundamental  principle  of <br />UNESCO: “The cultural heritage of each is the cultural heritage of all”.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Redondo_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:19:48 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Redondo_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Decay Patterns and Damage Processes of Historic Concrete: A Survey in the Netherlands]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Historic  concrete  buildings  (end  of  19th  century  –  1960s),  because  of  their <br />“experimental”  character,  require  a  specific  approach  to  both  survey  and  conservation. <br />Although they were built with  empirical  approaches,  some  buildings  show  a  fair  state  of <br />conservation  and  resilience  –even  though  they  have  already  exceeded  the  100-year <br />threshold– while others of comparable age are in severe need of restoration.  <br />As part of the European project CONSECH20, aimed at contributing to the conservation <br />of cultural-heritage concrete buildings, this paper investigates what are the most common <br />types of damage and hypothetical causes, and what direct and non-direct parameters can lead <br />to a faster or slower deterioration of historic concrete in the Netherlands. The research is <br />based on an initial screening study, which will be used as a basis for a larger research among <br />the participant countries. <br />The current research is divided in three phases. Firstly, a selection of 15 case studies <br />from the Netherlands are investigated; the selection was based on criteria of age, state of <br />conservation and  type  of  ownership.  Secondly,  the  history  and  materials  of  the  buildings <br />are  examined. Thirdly, an on-site visual survey is performed per each building, with pre-<br />design templates, to identify types of damage, extent and severity. The data is then analysed <br />combining different factors with a calculated index of severity. Results are discussed and <br />contrasted  to  provide  further clarification of the degradation of historic concrete. A fourth <br />phase, not discussed in this paper, will use this methodology in a broader context, with a <br />larger number of case studies in different countries.<br />The results indicate that the majority of types of damage are related to corrosion, being <br />the  hypothetical  cause  carbonation-induced  corrosion.  The  outcomes  of  the  investigation <br />point out that  the  factors  with a  higher  impact  on  the  durability  are  the  environment, <br />the  use  and maintenance of the buildings, the existence of a sacrificial plaster in exposed <br />elements, and the type of ownership.  <br />Considering the limited number of buildings, the conclusions presented in this paper will <br />be further contrasted with a larger number of case studies.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Marcos_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:22:04 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Marcos_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Early Concrete Structures and Post-Patented Systems: Lessons to Preserve Early 20th Historical Heritage]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Reinforced  concrete  was  introduced  by  patented  systems  into  Spain  towards  the end  of  the  19th  c.  Early  patents  were  effectively  foreign  trademarks,  although  Spanish engineers, architects and industrialists soon developed their own RC systems. Local builders would build structures with scarce little regard for calculated design and construction in the first decade of the 20th century. Nevertheless, as further knowledge was required, increasing research  led  to  new  RC  standards  in  numerous  countries,  such  as  France  and  Germany.  In the second decade of the 20th century, the use of patent systems declined. The teaching of RC started  at  the  Spanish  Civil  Faculty  where  systems  of  scientific  calculation  were  rapidly adopted,  although  no  Spanish  RC  standard  was  drafted,  unlike  the  situation  in  the  leading European countries of that time. Hence, the RC structures that proliferated across Spain were mainly based on French or German standards. Spanish industrial activity began to develop in northern  areas  of  the  country  where  the  use  of  new  materials  was  pioneered  over  the following  decades.  Nowadays,  some  of  those  structures  are  listed  heritage  buildings.  In  this paper, some common features of 15 RC structures built between 1915 and 1936 are discussed,  by  focusing  on  their  conservation  problems.  Preliminary  structural  reports  from engineers, architects, municipal councils and, in some cases, the owners of the buildings are compiled with information on the pathologies affecting the buildings and analyses of structural  morphologies,  and  steel  and  concrete  strengths.  The  results  of  those  studies  are analysed,  by  connecting  construction  features  with  structural  conditions,  in  order  to  gain  a deeper understanding of their main characteristics and similarities. The findings will contribute  to  knowledge  of  heritage  buildings,  identifying  key  strategies  for  application  in future rehabilitation works.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ranogajec_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:28:12 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ranogajec_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Holistic Approach to Cleaning and Protection of Stone Façades of 20th Century Architectural Heritage]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Modern  urban  areas  represent  our  recent  past  with  great  aesthetic  and  heritage value  which  should  be  maintained  and  preserved  for  the  future.  One  of  the  best  recognized landmarks of the city of Novi Sad, capital of Vojvodina region positioned in northern Serbia, is the architectural masterpiece Banovina Palace in which today resides provincial government.  It  is  an  elongated,  closed,  horseshoe-shaped  structure,  built  in  late  1930s  in  a modern  style  and  influenced  by  expressionist  architecture.  Two-floor  high  with  a  tower  on one end the building dominates the scenery and symbolizes the appearance of a large ship on the Danube River which flows in the immediate vicinity. <br />The  façade  of  this  famous  building  is  covered  with  white  marble  from  Adriatic  island  of Brac.  After  almost  80  years  of  exposure  to  weathering,  urban  pollution  and  manmade devastation, the façade was in need of cleaning, consolidation and protection. In the attempt to prepare for the European Capital of Culture 2021, the City of Novi Sad started  ambitious project  of  local  heritage  revival.  Due  to  awareness  of  lack  of  understanding  about  stone nature  and  behaviour,  stone  cleaning  and  protection  usually  raises  concerns  and  cautious. The Laboratory for Materials in Cultural Heritage, Faculty of Technology, was invited to join the project to preform holistic characterisation of the stone, reveal deterioration mechanisms, and propose conservation methodology.    <br />Using mobile laboratory with non-destructive techniques coupled with laboratory testing, the stone façade was comprehensively analysed. Various deterioration patterns were identified  including  patina, dirt  deposits,  eroding  surfaces,  yellow  layers  and  black  crusts, large  amounts  of carbonaceous particles  responsible  for  black  appearance  of  stone  surface, soluble  salts,  microbiological  corrosion,  residue  of  inadequate  graffiti  removal,  façade paints,  acrylic  binders,  as  well  as mechanical  damage  of  stone  panels.  Based  on  laboratory testing  of  a  number  of  cleaning,  consolidation  and  protection  techniques  and  products,  the most promising ones were also tested in situ [1]. Products ranging from traditional conservation  approaches  to  innovative  solutions  like  self-cleaning  photocatalytic  coating  as final  protective  layer,  were  selected  [2].  Resulting  from  research  the  methodology  for cleaning,  consolidation  and  protection  was  established  in  2017  and  implemented  in  2019, where  the  laboratory  acted  again  as  scientific  supervision  and  control  of  the  conservation works.  The  presented  approach  allowed  deep  understanding  of  the  complex  problem  and guaranteed  responsible  conservation  strategy;  therefore  it  stands  as  an  example  of  20th century architectural heritage preservation.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Sielicki_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:40:03 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Sielicki_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Reconstruction of a Masonry Windmill Tower with a Multi-Blade Wind Turbine, Steel Reservoir and Water Supply System]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>In  the  early  20th  century,  rapid  industrial  growth  around  the  world  enabled  the  development of many advanced mechanical structures. Some of these structures were successfully  used  to  improve  agricultural  efficiency  or  increase  people’s  comfort.  Such a situation  was  observed  in 1910  in  the  western  part  of  Poland,  which  at  the  time  was partitioned  by    Habsburg Austria,  the  Kingdom  of  Prussia,  and  the  Russian  Empire.  In  the city of Poznan, a Polish landlord built an advanced structure to automate his farming, using freely  available  wind  energy.  At  first  glance,  it  was  a  classic  windmill,  with  a  multi-blade wind  turbine  fixed  to  the  top  of  a  cylindrical  masonry  tower.  However,  some  additional  elements  demonstrate  the   uniqueness  of  such  a  structure  at  the  time.  One  hundred  years later,  the  structure  is  located  at  the  centre  of  a  rapidly  growing  area  of  the  city.  For  that  reason,  restoration  of  the  tower  is   complex  and  requires  the  reconstruction  of  damaged  or missing  elements  while  observing  new  safety  regulations.  In  this  work,  the  author  presents  the  basic  assumptions  necessary  for  the  future renovation process.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Dmochowski_et_al_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Dmochowski_et_al_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Reinforced Concrete Floors in Historic Buildings from the Beginning and the Middle of the 20th Century - Examples of Structural Strengthening in the Process of Revitalization]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>The paper presents a historical outline of structural solutions of reinforced concrete floors from the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries to the half of the 20th century in the Lower Silesia region of Poland. It is based on the analysis of archival documentation and expert research carried out during the design of the revitalization of historic public and industrial buildings. The structural typology of some simple RC floors slabs used in that time of introduction of concrete into construction life as well as constructional solutions of buildings erected in western Poland in those days are presented. Nowadays, while some of these buildings undergo refurbishment process to adapt them to new functional aims these RC floors have to be strengthened using different methods, depending on the assessment results. In some of the presented design study cases assessed technical state and load bearing capacity of floors ensure the possibility of their further use without the need for significant reinforcements, except for the need for surface material repairs. However, in some cases due to concrete deterioration processes and loss of its durability, despite necessity of material renovation, structural strengthening methods needed to be applied. For example, increasing the load bearing capacity of floors by making additional concrete layers cooperating with the existing reinforced concrete slab or by changing the static scheme by making new supports up to the complete replacement of floors (not only concrete ones) with modern, concrete rib-andbeam or composite ones were considered.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Nicol_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:45:48 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Nicol_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Senate Building of Canada Case Study: Seismic Rehabilitation]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Ottawa’s landmark Union Station was constructed between 1902 and 1912 to house Ottawa’s central railway station. Located in the Ottawa downtown core, it’s situated a short distance from Parliament Hill and across the street from the iconic Fairmont Chateau Laurier Hotel. In the early 1960s, the train tracks and train sheds were removed and replaced with Colonel By Drive parkway. The building sat vacant for quite some time, until it was revived when it underwent renovations in the early 1970s. A south addition was added with a unique geodetic canopy structure. The former Union Station had officially been adapted into the Government Conference Centre, which it remained until this rehabilitation project 2014-2018, which transformed the building into the temporary house of the Senate of Canada. The building was not accessible to the public when it was a Conference Centre, however since 2018 the building is again open to the public for the first time in 55 years.<br />The client’s objective for this rehabilitation was to increase useable floor space. A seismic upgrade of the existing heritage building was also required, along with the design of a new east addition. Existing floor plates required upgrading based on new user requirements. High heritage areas of the building had to be maintained in their original integrity and worked into the design upgrade.<br />Creative solutions were demanded to bring this existing heritage masonry building up to current seismic code, without the structure taking any more room within the floor spaces. Maximizing space was absolutely critical. As well as, ensuring the new building materials were compatible with the existing heritage building materials. Innovation was found in the balance between a minimal intervention approach and upgrading for current code requirements.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rouhi_Shrive_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:48:50 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rouhi_Shrive_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Structural Evaluation and Maintenance of Brooks Aqueduct Historic Site]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Brooks Aqueduct in Alberta, Canada is one of the largest and most sophisticated reinforced concrete aqueducts in the world. Now a national historic site, Brooks Aqueduct was built in 1914. The structure suffers from cracking and degradation in certain locations. To find out the possible main causes of potential overstress and damage in the different areas of the structure, it was evaluated by site inspections, some laboratory tests and analyzed numerically using Abaqus finite element software. Results of the numerical analysis are compared with the inspection and testing results and conclusions are made about the causes of deterioration and ways to conserve and repair the structure.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rouhi_Shrive_2021b</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:48:57 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rouhi_Shrive_2021b</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Structural Evaluation of the Greenhill Mine Tipple Structure Historic Site]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>The tipple building located within the Greenhill Mine complex (a Provincial historic site) in southern Alberta, Canada is a reinforced concrete frame with a steel superstructure. The structure has been analyzed to assess its current state and the extent and causes of deterioration. The analysis is performed using data obtained from field and laboratory tests and evaluations and by using SAP2000 structural analysis software. Possible ways for conservation and restoration of the building for two different future uses are explored, and recommendations are provided.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scipedia.com/public/Pasterkamp_2021a</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:54:07 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://www.scipedia.com/public/Pasterkamp_2021a</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Safety Level of Concrete Pile Foundations under Industrial Monuments]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Prefabricated concrete piles have been used for the foundation of bigger buildings for about a century. Often a change in function, an addition (also vertically) or another type of alteration is required, resulting in different loads on the foundation.<br />There are several complicating factors that return regularly in these assessments. The first one is a lack of data. Often drawings are missing or incomplete, e.g. showing only pile head dimensions or maximum calculated load but not the pile length, pile tip shape or material properties. Inspection is hard and only possible for the part directly under the pile head. And a third complication is that in The Netherlands there have only been official codes for piles since 1992.<br />Various calculation and design methods from WWII until 1985 are discussed to see if there is any consistency that might lead to an indication of the load bearing capacity of piles in The Netherlands from that era.<br />It is concluded that design rules for the load bearing capacity of concrete pile foundations in The Netherlands have been inconsistent over time. If the original detailed geotechnical calculations and/or structural drawings cannot be found in archives then the given ultimate loads cannot only not be exceeded; even if the load on a pile is currently less than stated on the technical specifications designers are advised not to increase the load.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Scipedia content</dc:creator>
</item>
</div><a id='index-272586'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272586'>History of construction and building technology<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272586'></div><a id='index-272587'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272587'>Inspection methods, non-destructive techniques and laboratory testing<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272587'></div><a id='index-272588'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272588'>Interdisciplinary projects and case studies<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272588'></div><a id='index-272589'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272589'>Management of heritage structures and conservation strategies<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272589'></div><a id='index-272590'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272590'>Numerical modeling and structural analysis<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272590'></div><a id='index-272591'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272591'>Repair and strengthening strategies and techniques<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272591'></div><a id='index-272592'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272592'>Resilience of historic areas to climate change and hazard events<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272592'></div><a id='index-272593'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272593'>Seismic analysis and retrofit<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272593'></div><a id='index-272594'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272594'>Structural health monitoring<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272594'></div><a id='index-272595'></a><h2 id='title' data-volume='272595'>Vulnerability and risk analysis<span class='glyphicon glyphicon-chevron-down pull-right'></span></h2><div id='volume-272595'></div></div>
</channel>
</rss>