Abstract

The present study focuses on a series of Calderonian turns of phrase in which characters, when expounding their dramatic situations, use terms associated with grammar or rhetoric. In some cases they remark on the congruity or incongruity of the theme of their speeches with what others have just said in theirs, using the grammatical-rhetorical notion of «case». Others adapt their narration or their argument to a pattern set by other (friendly or rival) characters, sometimes in a mechanical way. Still others represent their actions or passions in logical or grammatical terms, especially through the distinction between active and passive voice. In all of the above cases, the study explores to what extent this language reinforces or trivializes the impact of the emotions expressed, the social situation, or the movement of the plot.