Abstract

To explore the indications and efficacy of augmentative locking compression plate(LCP) or less invasive stabilization system(LISS)with autogenous bone grafting(BG) in treating distal femoral nonunion subsequent to failed retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN). A retrospective study was performed for 21 patients with distal femoral nonunion subsequent to failed RIN ,who received therapy with either augmentative LCP (n=11) or LISS with autogenous BG (n=13). Operation time, time to union,union rate, time to renonunion,complication rate and SF-36 scores a year after hardware removal were compared between the two groups. The bone union occurred in 13/13(100%) cases in augmentative LISS group versus 9/11(81.8%) cases in augmentative LCP group [odds ratio (OR)=3.21, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7-13] . Time to union,time to renonunion, complication rate of the augmentative LCP group were significantly more than that of the augmentative LISS with autogenous BG group (p=0.023, p=0.021 and p=0.033 ). No significant difference was found in the average operation time of two groups (p=0.121).At the follow-up a year after hardware removal, statistically significant HRQOL improvement in the augmentive LISS group was measured at the level of pain(p=0.003) and general health perception (p=0.011),as compared to the augmentive LCP group. We suggest augmentative LCP ,for distal femoral nonunios after RIN ,may be optimal for that of typeAO33A fractures, whereas augmentative LISS for that of typeAO33C fractures more.