Abstract

In the second half of the XVII century, Spanish romances of chivalry continued providing the theater and courtly festivities with characters, topic and motifs. Antonio de Solís y Ribadeneira’s interlude, El niño caballero, picks up a number of motifs from the heroic archetype that characterizes the knight, and he rewrites them in a burlesque tone. Also, the theatrical interlude stages a play of dances that the actors, among them, the famous «Juan Rana» present to the public. The article is accompanied by the critical edition of the text.

Abstract

The following discussion offers a panorama of the hermeneutical horizon from which the philological annotation apparatus of the Libro de los ritos critical edition was created. The book, written by the Dominican friar Diego Durán in 1579, describes the religious life of the Nahua people with emphasis in the Mexicas or Aztecs of the postclassical period. Also, this work offers some considerations about the ethnohistorical value of the Libro de los ritos and explains how this idea was used as a hypothesis to create the philological annotation apparatus of the critical edition. The value of the analysis of this experience is the contribution that it offers to the discussion between philologists about the proper methodology that must be used for the critical annotation of the Indian chronicles, documents that conserve the memory of the Native American people.

Abstract

Due to the banning of printing permissions for comedies and novels, the calderonian works lived various years on stage rather before being able to be printed.With the banning over, the vicissitudes that they went through during this period, that is, different performances that lead to different copies of the text depending on the company that had it, erroneous attributions, etc., harmed the poet’s comedies recovery work and, in some cases, diminished the quality of the final printed text.This is seen in the case of El príncipe constante, which closes the Primera parte de comedias (1636) of Calderón. It is an untidy edition which makes the current editor’s work difficult; he will have to turn to other reliable testimonies to rectify the edition’s mistakes in order to provide the reader with a text that is as close as possible to the poet’s hypotetical will.