Abstract

The report includes 5 city monographs or technical reports. http://create-mobility.eu/; These documents, D4.2 technical reports for stage 3 cities, reflect the work produced as part of WP4 during Task 3, “Qualitative analysis of transport policy development cycle processes in the five Stage 3 cities during the Shift from Stage 1 to Stage 3”. Paying attention to case-specific contextual factors, policy instruments and programmes and involved stakeholders, this case-study approach unveils the processes and the main driversfor change. D4.2 reports contribute to understanding the shift away from car-oriented policies towards alternative transport policies in different city contexts. Each report seeks to develop a comprehensive qualitative analysis of the historical development of policies relating to traffic congestion and car use over the past four decades. It investigates the ways in which transport policies are designed and implemented in the five Stage 3 cities, how they have evolved over time, which policy mix has been favoured at different times, their intended/unexpected effects, and how coordination has been ensured.

Abstract

This document, D4.3 Comparative analysis report, constitutes the third technical report produced as part of WP4 during Task 4, “A comparative analysis of policy processes across the five stage-3 cities”. It draws on the work done in Tasks 1, 2 and 3 as introduced in the 1st WP4 Technical report. http://create-mobility.eu/; Bringing together findings from each stage 3 cities (Berlin, Copenhagen, Paris Ile-de-France, London, Vienna), this D4.3 Comparative analysis report seeks to develop a comprehensive comparative analysis of policy developments relating to traffic congestion and car use over the past four decades. More precisely, it identifies those change factors that are specific to transport policies, and those that are related with the salience of transport issues in each city’s wider socio-political context. Moreover, it contributes to the understanding of which factors facilitated the introduction of sustainable mobility policies and which have retarded or blocked their introduction in different political and institutional contexts. Finally, this D4.3 Comparative analysis report discusses the relevance of the stage 1-to-3 evolutionary approach for understanding policy change