Abstract

This work investigates systematically strain localization and failure mechanics for elastoplastic damage solids. Two complementary methodologies, i.e., traction-based discontinuities localized in an elastic solid and strain localization of a stress-based inelastic softening solid, are addressed. In the former it is assumed a priori that the discontinuity (band) forms with a continuous stress field and along the known orientation. A traction-based failure criterion is introduced to characterize the discontinuity (band) and the orientation is determined from Mohr’s maximization postulate. If the (apparent) displacement jumps are retained as independent variables, the strong/regularized discontinuity approaches follow, requiring constitutive models for both the bulk and discontinuity (band). Elimination of the displacement jumps at the material point level results in the embedded/smeared discontinuity approaches in which an overall inelastic constitutive model fulfilling the static constraint suffices. The second methodology is then adopted to check whether the assumed strain localization can occur and identify its consequences on the resulting approaches. The kinematic constraint guaranteeing stress boundedness/continuity upon strain localization is established for general inelastic softening solids. Application to a unified elastoplastic damage model naturally yields all the ingredients of a localized model for the discontinuity (band), justifying the first methodology. Two dual but not necessarily equivalent approaches, i.e., the traction-based elastoplastic damage model and the stress-based projected discontinuity model, are identified. The former is equivalent to the embedded/smeared discontinuity approaches, whereas in the later the discontinuity orientation and associated failure criterion, not given a priori, are determined consistently from the kinematic constraint. The bi-directional connections and quivalence conditions between the traction- and stress-based approaches are classified. Closed-form 2D results under plane stress condition are also given, with the classical Rankine, Mohr-Coulomb, von Mises and Drucker-Prager criteria analyzed as the illustrative examples. A generic failure criterion of either elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic type, is then considered in a unified manner, resulting in many failure criteria frequently employed in practice.

PDF file

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] Armero, F., 1999. Large-scale modeling of localized dissipative mechanisms in a local continuum: applications to the numerical simulation of strain localization in rate-dependent inelastic solids. Mech. Cohes.-Frict. Mater., 4: 101-131.

[2] Armero, F. and Oller, S., 2000. A general framework for continuum damage models. I: Infinitesimal plastic damage models in stress space. Int. J. Solids Structures, 37: 7409-7464.

[3] Barenblatt, G.I., 1959. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axiallysymmetric cracks. J. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 23: 622-636.

[4] Barenblatt, G., 1962. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv. Appl. Mech., 7: 55-129.

[5] Baˇzant, Z.P. and Oh, B.H., 1983. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater. Struct. (RILEM, Paris), 16: 155–177.

[6] Camacho G.T. and Ortiz M., 1996. Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int. J. Solids Structures, 33: 2899-2938.

[7] Carol, I., Prat, P., and L´opez, C., 1997. Normal/shear cracking model: Application to discrete crack analysis. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123(8): 765-773.

[8] Carol, I., Rizzi, E., Willam, K., 1994. A unified theory of elastic degradation and damage based on a loading surface. Int. J. Solids Structures, 31(20): 2835-2865.

[9] Cervera, M., 2008a. A smeared-embedded mesh-corrected damage model for tensile cracking. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng.,76: 1930-1954.

[10] Cervera, M., 2008b. An othortropic mesh corrected model. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197: 1603-1619.

[11] Cervera, M., Chiumenti, M. and Di Capua, D., 2012. Benchmarking on bifurcation and localization in J2 plasticity for plane stress and plane strain conditions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 241-244: 206-224.

[12] Cervera, M. and Chiumenti, 2006a. Smeared crack approach: back to the original track. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 30: 1173-1199.

[13] Cervera, M. and Chiumenti, 2006b. Mesh objective tensile cracking via a local continuum damage model and a crack tracking technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 196: 304-320.

[14] Cervenka, J., 1994. Discrete Crack Modelling in Concrete Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder.

[15] Chen, W.F., 1994. Constitutive Equations for Engineering Materials: Plasticity and Modeling, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

[16] Comi, C. and Perego, U., 2001. Fracture energy based bi-dissipative damage model for concrete. Int. J. Solids Structures, 38: 6427-6454.

[17] Dugdale, D., 1960. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8: 100-108.

[18] Golub, G.H. and van Loan, C.F., 1996. Matrix computations, third edition (page 50). The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

[19] Govindjee, S.D, Kay, G.J. and Simo, J.C., 1995. Anisotropic modeling and numerical simulation of brittle damage in concrete.. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 38: 3611-3633.

[20] Hill, R., 1958. General theory of uniqueness and stability of elasto-plastic solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 6: 236–249.

[21] Hill, R., 1962. Acceleration waves in solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 10: 1–16.

[22] Hillerborg, A., Modeer, M. and Petersson, P.E., 1976. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concrete Res., 6: 773-782.

[23] Itskov, M., 2007. Tensor algebra and tensor analysis for engineers: With applications to continuum mechanics. Springer, Berlin.

[24] Jir´asek, M. and Zimmermann, T., 2001. Embedded crack model. I: Basic formulation. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 50(6): 1269-1290.

[25] Krajcinovic, D., 2003. Damage Mechanics. Elsevier B.V., Netherlands.

[26] Kuhl, E., Ramm, E. andWillam, K., 2000. Failure analysis of elasto-plastic material models on different levels of observation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 46: 1673-1698.

[27] Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H.K. and R¨usch, H., 1969. Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. ACI J., 66(8): 656-666.

[28] Lee, S.K., Song, Y.C. and Han, S.H., 2003. Biaxial behavior of plain concrete of nuclear containment building. Nucl. Eng. Des. 227, 143153.

[29] Li,W.Z., Guo, Z.H., 1991. Experimental research for strength and deformation of concrete under biaxial tension-compression loading (in Chinese). Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 8: 51-56.

[30] Malvern, L.E., 1969. Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey.

[31] Meschke, G, Lackner, R. and Mang, H.A., 1998. An anisotropic elastoplastic damage model for plain concrete. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 42: 703-727.

[32] Mohr, O., 1900.Welche Umst¨ande bedingen die Elastizit¨atsgrenze und den Bruch eines Materials? Civilingenieur: Zeitschrift des Vereins deutscher Ingenieure, VDI 44/45: 1524-1530; 1572-1577.

[33] Mosler, J., 2005. On advanced solution strategies to overcome locking effects in strong discontinuity approaches. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 63: 1313-1341.

[34] Most, T. and Bucher, C., 2007. Energy-based simulation of concrete cracking using an improved mixed-mode cohesive crack model within a meshless discretization. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 31: 285-305

[35] Ngo, D., Scordelis, A.C., 1967. Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams, ACI J., 64(14): 152-163.

[36] Ohlsson, U. and Olofsson, T., 1997. Mixed-mode fracture and anchor bolts in concrete analysis with inner softening bands. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123: 1027-1033.

[37] Ohtani, Y. and Chen, W.F., 1988. Multple hardening plasticity for concrete material. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 114: 1890–1910.

[38] Oliver, J., 1989. A consistent characteristic length for smeared cracking models. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 28: 461-474.

[39] Oliver, J., 1996. Modeling strong discontinuities in solid mechanics via strain softening contitutive equations. Part I: Fundaments & Part II: Numerical simulation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 39: 3575-3623.

[40] Oliver, J., Cervera, M. and Manzoli, O. 1998. On the use of strain-softening models for the simulation of strong discontinuities in solids. Material instabilities in solids: 107-123, Wiley.

[41] Oliver, J. Cervera, M. and Manzoli, O., 1999. Strong discontinuities and continuum plasticity models: the strong discontinuity approach. Int. J. Plast., 15: 319-351.

[42] Oliver, J., 2000. On the discrete constitutive models induced by strong discontinuity kinematics and continuum constitutive equations. Int. J. Solids Structures, 37: 7207-7229.

[43] Oliver, J., Huespe, A.E., Pulido, M.D.G., Chaves, E., 2002. From continuum mechanics to fracture mechanics: the strong discontinuity approach. Eng. Fract. Mech., 69: 113-136.

[44] Oliver, J., Huespe, A.E., Pulido, M.D.G., Blanco, S. and Linero, D., 2006. On the fracture models determined by the continuum-strong discontinuity approach. Int. J. Fract., 137: 211-229.

[45] Oliver, J., Huespe, A.E. and Dias, I.F., 2012. Strain localization, strong discontinuities and material fracture: Matches and mismatches. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 241-244: 323-336.

[46] Ortiz., M., 1985. A constitutive theory for the inelastic behavior of concrete. Mech. Mater., 4: 76-93.

[47] Ottosen, N. and Runesson, K., 1991. Discontinuous bifurcations in a non-associated Mohr material. Mech. Mater., 12: 255- 265.

[48] Pietruszczak, S., and Mro´z, Z., 1981. Finite-element analysis of deformation of strain-softening materials. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 17: 327-334.

[49] Pandolfi, A., Krysl, P. and Ortiz, M., 1999. Finite element simulation of ring expansion and fragmentation: the capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture. Int. J. Fracture, 95: 279-297.

[50] Rashid, Y., 1968. Analysis of prestressed concrete pressure vessels. Nucl. Eng. Des., 7: 334-344.

[51] Rice, J.R. and Rudnicki, J.W., 1980. A note on some features of the theory of localization of deformation. Int. J. Solids Structures, 16: 597-605.

[52] Roscoe, K.H., 1970. The influence of strains in soil mechanics, 10th Rankine Lecture. G´eotechnique, 20: 129-180.

[53] Rosenthal, I. and Glucklich, J., 1970. Strength of plain concrete under biaxial stress. ACI Journal, 67: 903–914.

[54] Rots, J.G., et al., 1985. Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete. Heron, 30: 1-47.

[55] Rots, J.G., 1988. Computational modeling of concrete fracture. Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

[56] Rots, J.G., Blaauwendraad, J., 1989. Crack models for concrete: discrete or smeared? fixed, multi-directional or rotating? Heron, 34(1): 1-59.

[57] Rudnicki, J.W. and Rice, J.R., 1975. Conditions of the localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant material. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 23: 371–394.

[58] Runesson, K., Ottosen, N.S. and Peric, D., 1991. Discontinuous bifurcations of elastic-plastic solutions at plane stress and plane strain. Int. J. Plast., 7: 99-121.

[59] Simo, J.C. and Ju, J.W., 1987. Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models. I: Formulation; II: Computational aspects. Int. J. Solids Structure, 23(7): 821-869.

[60] Simo, J.C. and Oliver, J., 1994. A new approach to the analysis and simulation of strain softening in solids. In: Z.P. Baˇzant et al. (eds.), Fracture and Damage in Quasibrittle Structures, E & FN Spon: 25-39.

[61] Simo, J.C., Oliver, J. and Armero, F., 1993. An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by strain-softening in rateindependent inelastic solids. Comput. Mech. , 12: 277-296.

[62] Stankowski, T., Runesson, K., Sture, S., 1993. Fracture and slip of interfaces in cementitious composites. I: Characteristics, II: Implementation. J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 90: 845-867.

[63] Steinmann, P., Willam, K., 1991. Localization within the framework of micropolar elastoplasticity. Advances in Continuum Mechanics, VI: 296-313.

[64] Thomas, T.Y., 1961. Plastic Flow and Fracture of Solids. Academic Press, New York.

[65] Vrech, S.M. and Etse, G., 2006. Geometrical localization analysis of gradient-dependent parabolic Drucker-Prager elastoplasticity. International Journal of Plasticity, 22: 943-964.

[66] Weihe, S., KrRoplin, B. and de Borst R., 1997. Classification of smeared crack models based on material and structural properties. Int. J. Solids Structures, 35(5): 467-484.

[67] Wu, J. Y., 2011. Unified analysis of enriched finite elements for modeling cohesive cracks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 200(45-46): 3031-3050.

[68] Wu, J. Y., Cervera, M., 2013. Strain localization in elastoplastic damage solids. In: Proceeding of International Symposium on Innovation & Sustainability of Structures in Civil Engineering (ISISS-2013), Harbin, China.

[69] Wu, J. Y., Cervera, M., 2014. On the stress continuity condition for strain localization in softening solids. In: Proceeding of 11th World Congress On Computational Mechanics (WCCM-2014), Barcelona, Spain.

[70] Wu, J.Y. and Xu, S.L., 2011. An augmented multicrack elastoplastic damage model for tensile cracking. Int. J. Solids Structures, 48: 2511-2528.

[71] Wu, J.Y. and Xu, S.L., 2013. Reconsideration on the elastic damage/degradation theory for the modeling of microcrack closure-reopening (MCR) effects. Int. J. Solids Structures, 50(5): 795-805.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 05/07/17
Submitted on 05/07/17

Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 61
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?