The effects of the thermal properties of three flooring materials on the spread rate of polymer melt over the surface were studied using a model based on the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM). The high thermal conductivity of steel keeps the steel floor at a nearly uniform temperature throughout, whereas the ceramic and oak floors are able to sustain a higher temperature beneath the point at which the hot melt is dripping onto the surface. In general, the spread rate is controlled by the viscosity at the outer edges of the melt pool. The spread rate over steel is therefore fastest, especially for a thin floor that rapidly increases in temperature. The low thermal inertia of oak results in rapid changes in surface temperature, which traps the heat close to the interface between the floor and the melt and maintains a high temperature and low viscosity in the center of the melt pool. The ceramic floor transports heat more readily and may develop a hot spot underneath. The material properties of ceramic lie between those of oak and steel, but although the spread rate over a steel floor is always faster than over ceramic, the spread rate over oak may not always be slower.

PDF file

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


1 Sherratt, J. and Drysdale, D., “The effect of the melt-flow process on the fire behaviour of thermoplastics”, Interflam 2001, Interscience Communications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 149-159.

2 Butler, K.M., Oñate, E., Idelsohn, S.R., Rossi, R., “Modeling polymer melt flow using the Particle Finite Element Method”, Interflam 2007, Interscience Communications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 929-940.

3 Butler, K.M., “A model of melting and dripping thermoplastic objects in fire”, Fire and Materials 2009, Interscience Communications Ltd, London, UK.

4 Oñate, E., Rossi, R., Idelsohn, S.R., Butler, K.M., “Melting and spread of polymers in fire with the particle finite element method”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 81 (8), 2009, pp.1046-1072.

5 Idelsohn, S.R., Oñate, E., Del Pin, F., “The particle finite element method: a powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 61, 2004, pp. 964-989.

6 Oñate, E., Idelsohn, S.R., Del Pin, F., Aubry, R., 2004. The particle finite element method. An overview. International Journal of Computational Methods 1 (2), pp.267–307.

7 Edelsbrunner, H. and Mucke, E.P., “Three dimensional alpha shapes”, ACM Trans. Graphics, Vol. 13, 1999, pp. 43-72.

8 Ohlemiller, T. and Shields, J., “Aspects of the Fire Behavior of Thermoplastic Materials”, NIST TN 1493, 2008.

9 Drysdale, D., An Introduction to Fire Dynamics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1998.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 09/06/17
Submitted on 09/06/17

Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?